The blogger formally known as Saint

Hey if Red Rover (sorry I mean cian) can do it so can I. I have changed my name back from Saint to my real name Simon. Now if you didn't guess that was my name from the use of saint I pity you. :-)

Is the Green Party locked into the rainbow?

Just had a read of Ciarán Cuffe Green Party TD for Dún Laoghaire blog. Interesting statement about the other two parties in the supposed Rainbow Coalition.

Report of chairs being thrown through the windows of the Progressive Democrats Headquarters on South Frederick Street. Possibly the same chairs that Pat Rabbitte and Enda Kenny used for their phot-op at Dunne and Crescenzi a few months previously. Speaking of which, whatever happened to that Programme for Government that they were working on, or was it all froth from their cappuccinos?

Not the nicest thing to say if you were planning to row in behind a Fine Gael-Labour Coalition or even if it was your first choice I would think. Am I reading too much into it?. Now some time ago I heard that Trevor Sergeant said that the Greens would not enter a coalition with Fianna Fail with him in charge . Leaving only the rainbow option. However does Mr Cuffe statement sound like a party locked into the rainbow. That statement would not have been unusual from a PD or Fianna Failer. Anyone have thoughts on this?

Update: Land of Ireland has more on this.

Dail Questions about the Riots

The Dail debate is starting you can watch it here. Update: Well it over now. But you can read the debates. Here and here

The rise of wannabe knacker culture

Where I come from Knackers are not members of the travelling community they are basically the kinds of people that riot in Dublin, drug dealers, vandals, joy riders etc. Many people have been making the point that these people who rioted are the ones that the state has left behind. Which is valid in a way. Some of these kids don’t know better and don’t have no other prospects. So they get easily caught up in republican rhetoric. But many of the people who were arrested were not from these areas. They have futures, they have education they have secure homes. So why do they throw bricks at people. I believe it is the rise of wannabe knacker culture.

One of the most popular rappers in the world is 50 cent. Ask any kid why they listen to him and talk about how he got shot and was a drug dealer. They talk about how he is rapping about real life. Real life is being stuck in traffic for 3 hours a day. Being a “gangsta”(another word for knacker) is not, yet this is what some kids think it is real life. Kids from all social backgrounds walk around the city in hoodies acting and aspiring to be knackers. Many of these kids that are not deprived, they have everything they need in life. Yet they want to be the “hard men”. Why?

Senator David Norris talked about how in deprived communities that once the first few locals get educated and become doctors, lawyers and dentists. They will become role models and make kids in these areas will want to be doctors and not drug dealers. Yet lets look at the areas where kids have loads of positive role-models where there neighbours are Doctors Dentists and Lawyers. These kids are rioting too. Many arrested on Saturday did not come from deprived areas. Did the reclaim the street anti-capitalist riots come from deprived areas or well off areas.? Mostly they came from well-off backgrounds these people are not marginalised. In fact they are the least marginalised in the country. They talk about fighting for the working class. Yet the working class think that they are a disgrace and many have never meet a working class person. They just want to fight the “pigs” and be anti-social.

The state of education in inner city areas is a disgrace to say the least but to say that marginalisation is the cause of these riots is in my opinion wrong. Sure marginalisation causes a lot of crime joyriding being one but not every crime is due to this. Why are lower class rioters called marginalised and lashing out at society while middle class rioters are called politically motivated. Are we saying lower classed cannot be politically motivated, are we saying middle class kids are marginalised. Or is it the case that many people and mainly young males just want to be knackers.

Domino Pizza Attempt to recreate 1950s Ireland

The founder of Domino's Pizza wishes to create the first town in "America to be run according to strict Catholic principles".

Oh Dev would be so proud. Will it be run by a John Charles Mcquaid clone I wonder. Update: Just listening to Air America Radio. They are giving out about this and blaming Bush(what's new I hear you ask). See the difference between this an 1950s Ireland is that the Domino's pizza guy is not forcing people to live by a catholic ethos. You don't have to live there if you do not want to. If people want to be suppressed by a Catholic hierarchy well who are we to stop them.

More on the riots

I have to agree with Planet Potato, the march should be re-run. We can not let the scumbags who rioted and looted win. The march must go on.

There has been some people saying that this march was not about republicanism but because people have been marginalised. So other then the fact that these people are middle class socialist that can’t understand why the working class vote Fianna Fail and don’t rise up and over throw the bourgeoisie. Do they have a point.?

Surely the only people who would riot are the marginalised and downtrodden in Celtic Tiger Ireland. Yet some of the people arrested and in court were seemingly from upper class areas. This shows I think that the idea that this was the repressed rising up is ridicules. This was a rising of scumbags fuelled by republican rhetoric and a desire just to cause mayhem. While many of the scum did come from areas that have social deprivation and this was a factor in the riots. It is a minuscule part of it. There is an underbelly of anti-orangeism in the South while most people don’t vent it in public and only in private. The fact that it remains in society says something about us. I mean many people have put "We are all danes now" buttons on their blogs to support Danish Free Speech. Will anyone put a "We are all orange now" to support their freedom of speech.

I think not. We are still not that accepting of people who subscribe to the latter third of the Irish flag. Remember the Danes invade us and occupied this Island as well.

But much of the rioting though fuelled by Republicanism was merely perpetrated by people who thought it would be a bit of craic.

Instapundit

I have been along with some other been linked to by instapundit blog. So I have to say thanks to them and hello to the odd thousand readers I have got from there. Does that mean I have more readers today then the Limerick Leader daily edition :-)

DUP position themselves to isolate Sinn Fein.

Interesting speech by DUP Deputy Leader and East Belfast MP, Peter Robinson today. Apart from the Sinn Fein/IRA linkage claims from the IMC report. There seems to be moves to start links with the south and the southern parties. He said.

Unionists know Northern Ireland has much to gain through good relations with the Irish Republic

Considering Jim Allister DUP MEP said a few days ago that

Bearing this reality in mind, the most obvious and natural area of co-operation is co-operation undertaken on an east-west basis, rather than the unnatural and politically-motivated north-southery

So suddenly it has gone from unnatural to much to gain. Also

The dangers unreconstructed republicans pose in democratic politics is the same in Dublin as it is in Belfast. They have the potential to pollute the entire political process.

..............

I hope that you come to see you have more in common with democratic unionists (with a small "d"; and "u") than with unreconstructed republicans even though you may share with them the same ultimate constitutional objective.

I can see this line increase in an attempt to use the Dublin Riots to isolate Sinn Fein. Even though it was not Sinn Fein who organised the riots. It is quiet likely that Sinn Fein members were in the thick of it and some of the tabloids have reported this. If this is proved and linked to the Dublin branch. Mary Lou may not get her seat. But even if it is not linked Sinn Fein will suffer. Despite Mr Aherns 's attempt to reclaim republicanism from Sinn Fein republicans are still seen as Sinn Fein whether they are or not. For once Bertie maybe happy he failed.

The Riots and the consequences.

As the dust settles (pun not intended) on what has to be the worst riot in Ireland in over 20 years. It is time to take stock of what happened and figure out what the consequences of this are. In my piece on the Love Ulster parade I said that the “biggest and hardest test for Irish society is not seeing can we accept Poles or Nigerians but can we accept Unionists.” It looks very much like we have failed that test.

Many people have blamed Michael McDowell for this. Which of course they would.I mean he is the reason it rains so much in the country. But beyond the normal McDowell bashers. There is some valid points to be made.

1. Was it right to hold the march. 2. Was it right to have it go through a building site. 3. Were the Gardaí unprepared.

The answer to the first question is an resounding yes. People said that the parade should not have gone ahead as it would only lead to this sort of behaviour. But as George W would say you can not give into terrorism. And that is what the riots were terrorism. If something is right (and a persons right to march is) then you cannot give in to terrorism. If the Love Ulster parade was stopped or banned then we would have abandoned all things this country stands for all the things the founding fathers and mothers fought for. And paradoxically everything Republican Sinn Fein say they stand for.

On the question of should the march have been sent through a building site. Should the march have been diverted. O’Connell street is the main street, to deny them the right to march there sends out a very clear signal that they were being sidelined. If they had told them that they feared a riot. Then it would look like we expected that the march would not be tolerated. On the other hand public safety needs to be top of their agenda. But looking at the trouble on Nassau Street. It looks like this was going to happen where ever the march was held.

The Gardaí were not prepared for the scale of this. The rioting in Nassau street was happening without Gardaí presents. They had made a judgement call to protect the Dail.(The right one) The Gardaí are heros but the numbers in Dublin were not sufficient to control the situation. They should have drafted in more from the countryside. For the May day riots in 2004 the Gardai loaned a water cannon from the PSNI. Yet none was there today. Why not? On a cold day like today. The rioters would not have rioted for so long if they had been covered in ice cold water. Why was a water cannon not procured. It cost the Government €6000 to loan them last time. Compared to the damage caused, money lost to the economy and damage to Ireland image abroad for investors and tourists. €6000 is a miniscule sum. The riot were not entirely unpredictable. So water cannon vehicles should have been secured prior to this. Michael McDowell certainly has a case to answer on this.

But he is not to blame for the riot in the first place. The fact that they attacked the PD's offices show that McDowell is certainly getting to them which means he is not far off the mark with what he says. So who is to blame The blame for this lies sole at the feet of one group. Republican Sinn Fein (RSF). They were the only ones to oppose the march. The rest of the parties supported their right to march. Sinn Fein said ignore them. Saoirse the RSF paper said. “Saoirse calls on all Republicans to oppose the loyalist march due to take place through the centre of Dublin”

Also

“The proposed loyalist march is very definitely part of a softening-up process for an Official Visit to Dublin by an English Queen claiming part of Ireland. The like has not been seen since Partition in 1921. And now, on the 90th anniversary of the 1916 Rising, the siren voices tell Republicans to ignore this loyalist march. If we do, they will return with even greater insistence and tell us to ignore the state Visit of the Queen of England. In other words, to stay away, make no protest, and accept finally that the Six Occupied Counties belong to England. Is that what you want? NEVER.”

This is very strong language clearly they saw this as a fight. This was organised. Rioters came with petrol. This was not spontaneous lads saying “feck it lets chuck a brick”. There is talk that some anarchist groups were evolved and reports of black flags in the crowd suggest that they did have some part in it. Also reported is that some RSF people seem to have tried to quieten the crowd down. Whether this is true or not is not the issue. RSF certainly provided the fuel (metaphorically speaking) for the rioting even if they didn’t light the match.

Ireland's image has taken a battering tourist numbers will be down, foreign companies may think twice about locating here. This could seriously damage us in the future. Another aspect of the riots. Is RTE’s failure to deliver on its public service remit. They go on about the need for licence fees and public service. And yet during the worst rioting in the last 20 years. RTE One had the Robe “An Oscar-winning biblical epic about a soldier who wins Jesus's robe” while RTE Radio had sports coverage. The only source of news was Newstalk and to a lesser extent BBC, breakingnews.ie and blogs. Clearly there was a desire for information that was not forthcoming from the rest of the media. I have never had as many visitors to my blog. People were desperate to know what happened and RTE was not telling them. But there is a more serious aspect to it. As Richard Delevan asks “If RTE 1 had gone away from sport for the afternoon, might some people have turned their cars around and stayed home today?” The answer is an undoubted yes. If someone had died in the riot. Someone that if RTE had been broadcasting about it would have gone home. Then RTE would have been to blame. They are the public service broadcaster. They have failed in servicing the public. Why they did this needs to be seriously examined and heads should roll.

The winners in this series of riots is not the rioters. They think that they have won. That they have stopped the march. That they have fought and won for their country. They could not be more wrong. They have lost, republicanism has lost, Ireland was lost. It is the very thing that they are fighting against loyalists that have won. The minute Jeffery Donalason said on RTE news . That people have been talking about giving Northern representation in the Dail and I can’t even talk outside the Dail. It was game set and match unionism.

No longer will Nationalist be able to say that the Unionist would be welcomed in the South. Because obviously they can say last time we came down to the South we were deigned our civil rights. Next time someone brings up the suppression of the civil rights marches in the North in the 60s and 70s. They will come back and say are civil right to march was also suppressed by the South. They will look at Ireland’s top reporter Charlie Bird being attacked and called an “orange bastard”. And say that the South would suppress unionists right to freedom of expression. They will look at the attack on the PD’s office and say they do not tolerate political parties that do not tow the republican line.

The prospects of a United Ireland or even cross border cooperation have been utterly shattered today. Recently it looked like the two governments were going to put pressure on the DUP to talk with Sinn Fein. That pressure will surely now dissipate. This just gives the DUP even more ammunition against the Irish state. They have been going after Mary McAlease for the past while. Trying to make a big deal out of nothing. Now they don’t even need to make a big deal out of anything. We are the ones that are going to do it. Jeffrey Donaldson said “"We have received a warm welcome from ordinary Dubliners, but its clear these republicans have come from north of the border and other areas intent only on causing trouble.” He can now say “Ich Bin ein Dubliner“ and the Irish people will feel guilty about this and quiet rightly too. The government are going to be far more conciliatory to the Unionist as an apology for the rioting and tougher on Nationalism. To all those rioters who are cheering themselves saying they got rid of the enemy know this you are cheering a victory for Unionism and a defeat for Ireland.

Picture From An Spailpín

Riots in Dublin

Update: I have decided to post a link to my opinion on the The Riots and the consequences at the top of this post. Also my opinion on the Love Ulster Parade a few weeks ago. What follows is the post I created on the day. As the news came in on 26/02/06

---

What is the deal with the riots between Republican Sinn Fein and the Gardaí­. If there was anything that the likes of Paisley needed to futher say they would not be tolerated in a United Ireland this is it.

I have posted about the Love Ulster Parade some weeks ago.

Update. Newstalk.ie report that there is about 600 people rioting. They have blocked O'Connell street. They are using the rubble from the building site to throw.And that the Gardaí don't think the Love ulster Parade will go ahead.

Update: BBC report.

The Irish Times weather Camera shows the rioting

Update: Dublin Traffic Cameras have Pictures

Update: Newstalk.ie">St Stevens Green and City Quey closed.

Update: Newstalk.ie report. The Rioting has now moved towards Nassau street .Where there is no Gardaí. Cars have been over turned and burned. The Fire has spread to a Building. The Fire Brigade is not there.

Update : the Love ulster People have been bused home

Update: The PD's office has been attacked. The Gardaí have charged the Riots on Nassau St and has been brought under control. TV crews have been attacked.

Update: BBC have TV footage. Can watch it here

Update: Backstreet Drivers have some Photos. There are definite signs this has been pre-planed. People don't bring petrol into town for peaceful protestors. Update: Newstalk report Charlie Bird was seen with his head bleeding

I would say that the attack on the PDs office. Shows that McDowell is getting to the republican movement.

Update: Politians Condemn it. Sinn Fein Sean Crowe says "some people allowed themselves to be provoked by the 'Love Ulster' rally". Seems to me that he is saying that they let themselves fall for a loyalist trap. Rather then saying that is unacceptable for people's right to protest being violated.

Update: A rioter in Dublin said that he was fighting for his country. Des Dalton VP Republican Sinn Fein. Says that RSF are not participating in the riot. Does not condomn it. Says that the Political establishment is out of touch. Saying the rioters are ordinary Dubliners. Who don't like the sectarian Love ulster parade.

Update: 100 people have charged into Jervis Street Shopping centre.

Why are RTE radio not covering this. All these people who have been caught in the riot. Could have been able to leave the city if they had been informed. But RTE the public service broadcaster is having sports news how is that public service.

Update: Kevin from DL has an Eye Witness Report.

Update: Look at the guy in the centre with the brick

Great pictures. From 06scura check them out. Hat tip (Red Mum)

Update: 37 arrested.

Update: Elblogador has a good piece on it.

Update: The rioting seems to have died down thank god.

Update: Philbsboro has more photos

Update: Loads more Photos on Flickr

Update 17:41: 16 in Hospital 6 of them Gardaí and 40 arrested

Update 21:39. From the Dublin City traffic Camera. A battered and bruised O'Connell Street returns to "normal". I will upload a post a more substantial post about The Riots and the consequences Later

Update: 23:00 CNN say it is IRA supporters

Auds has links to other blogs talking about it An Spailpin has an interesting theory

Update: Shocking Picture of an Asian Guy being attacked. There certainly more to this riot then republicanism

Back seat drivers have pictures. Hat tip TAFKABO on Slugger

Update: United Irelander has some shocking Video footage.

Update: Riots in portadown as well.

More videos here.

Twenty talks about it as only twenty can. Direct, true and very crude.

Justice Minister Michael McDowell. Says Gardaí 'were unprepared for Dublin riot' Update: A special Sunday Bunch Podcast.

Update : The Dail(parliment) Debate about the riots has started. Can be followed here.

Kevin Myres 1916 Questions

Kevin Myres in the Irish Times on thuresday asked 5 questions saying that no one answered them. So here I will attempt to answer them.

What right had the 1916 insurgents to kill anyone? Why had none of the signatories of the Proclamation ever stood for parliament? How could they call the butchers of Belgium "gallant allies"? How could people today "celebrate" an orgy of violence in which hundreds of innocent Irish people died?,

First question. Their right came from the quest for freedom. Whether or not the country was better run by the British or not is beside the issue. People have the right to be free. Self-determination if you will. If you think they didn't have a right then what right have the people of Iraq to be free. Which Mr Myres is in favour of.

The last election prior to 1916 was in 1910. In 1910 Eamon Ceannt was not in any movement he joined the IRB in 1913 Joseph Plunkett was also not in any movement joining the IRB in 1915 Thomas MacDonagh was also not in any movement (save Gaelic League ) joining the ORB in 1915 Pearse was busy trying to keep his lost making school afloat and was not involved in politics. James Connolly was deputy head of the ITGWU so his efforts were devote to that
So in 1910 only one of the leaders Sean MacDiarmada was active in a political way. Being in the IRB. It would therefore it is not particularly unusual that none of the leaders ran for parliament.

Their gallant allies gave them their weapons. They hoped the Germans if they won would give them a republic. They were unlikely to criticise them. Did Canada condemn the butchers of Dresden.? War time politics is rarely ever moral. And always Machievalian

How could people today "celebrate" an orgy of violence. Every country does American, France Ireland is no different 1916 is our defining moment.

I worth about this here.1916 Commemoration and Neo-Redmondness

Also to his point. Did the murderers of Jerry McCabe not arrogate that self-same right. No the difference with the North is in the south well over 90% of the people were nationalists that wanted to move away from Britain. They were fighting the majorities cause. In the North the IRA could never say it was fighting the majorities cause.

Top 6 Friday Threats to world Peace.

6. North Korea. Some time ago got nuclear weapons. This regime is extreme and crumbling. They will not stop at using these weapons to survive. Also with American armies in South Korea. They may get itchy fingers on the button.

5. China’s booming economy is making it hungry for resources. They are investing heavily in African countries. Expanding their influence. The west thought the opening of the economy would lead to increased freedom for it’s people. But what cases such as Google show. Is this regimes power is not being diminished. And they still have their eyes on Taiwan who is supported by America.

4. Russia’s Gas grip on Europe. I have talked about this.

3. The collapse of the U.N . The U.N is the one organisation that can bring countries together to work together and work through divisions. But as I argued here the UN’s inability to effectively work beyond self interests could herald its demise as a body that can help maintain world peace.

2. Fundamental Islam. Does this one need to be explained. Iran, Syria, 9/11 Madrid 7/11 reaction to Danish cartoons. Fundamental Islamist are manipulating the poor moderates to make them believe that they are at war with the west. That they have to destroy the west. This large bank of hatred building up is going to boil over and effect us all. And people in the west like these people. Are helping the fundamental Imams turn moderate Muslims in to potential Jihadists.

1. Oil makes the world go round. It is vital for every countries economy and food production. Without it the world order would collapse. As resources diminish oil will drive countries to more and more desperate measures.

Paragraph Problems

It seems Blogger has got rid of all the paragraph spacing in posts. Sorry about this. Hopefully can get it sorted soon.

Mary, Mary quite contrary.....

Poor Mary McAleese has as ever been caught up in a somewhat important argument, instigated on a number of occasions by her predecessor, Mary Robinson-what the hell is her job? We use non-committal words such as ‘figure head role’, ‘symbolic’, ‘representative’, ‘guardian of the constitution’, without understanding them, hearing about the expense to the taxpayer of running the Presidency on a slow news day but based on the fact that until 1990 we were largely forking out for green fees never really having to ask big questions. Our constitution says that she takes precedence over all others in the state, yet the woman cannot take a trip abroad without the permission of the Dail and certainly her remarks in Saudi Arabia last week would have been written to the satisfaction of the government.

There are few apolitical acts, she is caught up in power struggles where her role is essentially cowering over the elderly in nursing homes and cowering over the young in maternity awards and generally not being allowed to pass comment on anything that happens in between these stages in the life cycle.

However, the debates at the moment on the exact nature of her duties, how any powers are negated by the governments veto and the extent to which she can be said to represent us have dominated our media with each missing the essential point. They have failed to grasp the primordial instinct driving the Presidents actions at the moment.

It is clear that there are two many women named Mary in Irish politics and McAleese needs to create a legacy of some sort in this era of Mary’s. What careful political orchestration, she clearly took a master class in ‘Political Shaking It Up Big Time’. Class 1: speak at a press conference in Saudi Arabia, in a room where women use a different exit to the men and sit behind a screen. You are there to ensure Saudis continue to use their oil money to buy our butter, you choose to make a some way political statement. Instead of commenting on how your sex is not allowed make eye contact with men in your host country (that would be condoned and make the news after 6.30 when everyone has turned over to ‘Home and Away’), which is so old news, jump on the Cartoon bandwagon knowing you’ll upset people back home. Robinson before her brought Rwandan atrocities to our attention, shook Gerry Adams hand pre cease fire and passed comment on the divorce referendum with no shortage of objection on all accounts. McAleese needs to make her mark in light of such actions. (Don’t forget Robinson’s husband Nick is a cartoonist himself so there would be a tactical team in place to keep her away from microphones were she still our head of state at the moment for the benefit of Irish embassies all over the Middle East at the moment. )

Mary Wallace’s return to Irish politics, albeit on the back bench, has been turned into a story for some reason and no doubt will spell the end of the Haughey legacy in Irish politics. It was worth the sacrifice, clearly the return was instigated to get rid of Sile DeValera and ensure the sanctity of Mary’s in the Dail. Smell conspiracy much? I pity poor Liz O’Donnell and how the front bench will deal with the affront her parents made to Irish politics when they christened her Liz. Her mentor, Mary Harney will be forever remembered for her arranged marriage to some poor bastard from the VHI to make her seem human and the fact that the collapsing dam that is our health services have been made worse by her sticking her finger in it. Mary O’Rourke has spoken on national radio from a bath and signed off on the Luas routes not being connected so to herald her campaign to return to front line politics will no doubt pose nude on the front of ‘The Village’. McAleese has a tough job ahead of her making her mark in the annals of Irish history, how can she hope to be included in the list of famous Mary’s of Ireland when she must contend with Mary Hanafin having spent her tenure in Education talking about league tables while a quarter of our adult population are some way illiterate. How she can hope to make as big a political cock-up as Mary Lou McDonnell to join a political party and look dumbfounded every time you are presented with evidence (including their website) of their ‘past’ as if you are hearing it for the first time. I think Mary Lou should run for President, no woman can dodge political questions so well.

If you look a little deeper though you will see this is part of a Mary manifesto. Let the progression of this blog, from discussing empty rhetorical politics to the epiphany that has been the realisation of the mass political conspiracy that is going on guide you. Let this blog be the first to start asking the real questions- is this the beginning of the men of the Dail creating ‘Stepford Wife’ type women politicians and the dodgy computer system they bought is only programmed to name all its models Mary, maybe the women in place were about to make progress or instill some reform so the men decided to replace them with incompetent bureaucrats? The perplexed look of countless farmers across the country is now easily explained away, no one wanted to deal with them so they got a Mary drone (Coughlan). Lets hope she was programmed some way decently to cope with the bird flu, having her in place was good forward planning for the Dail boys who aren’t too hot on the idea of implementing national strategies. The same thinking clearly applied in allocating the poisoned chalice of Health, give it to a Mary. O’Rourke may have been an early prototype, she was simply sent to the Seanad in the last election for some re-wiring. Was it really a coincidence that the borders of her constituency were altered at election time? Clearly, Robinsons model did not work or maybe it worked too well so she has been sent on an international tour to show how Mary’s can be used to make a mark on the international stage- lets use her to have our first female President. Perception is very important. McAleeses model must be proving effective that they arranged for her to go uncontested, maybe they got Michael D his own Marybot to keep him quite? Is McAleeses programming funny at the moment that she is acting up or is she a pawn in some ploy?

Also, why send a prominent politician such as Charlie McCreevy to Brussels, is he spreading word of the conspiracy or has it already reached their shores and he is looking for funding to upgrade and get sexier deputies? Maybe the hope is that if the women get better looking, T.D’s will turn up in the Dail or people will start watching Oireachtas report? Is this the mad plan of a man who wants to reform public broadcasting and end the torture that is Fair City? We have sent John Bruton to represent the EU in the UN, that can’t be a real job so surely he is the representative of the conspiracy of the States, Hilary Clinton’s days are definitely numbered. Has the technology already reached there, maybe the Democrats swopped the Bush Twins with Mary politicobots? Know now that there are weapons of mass destruction, its title- Project Mary.

P.S: Reply if you want to help me break into the Dail to help Liz O’Donnell, she needs our help, we must act fast. She was on the Political Party was Ursula Halligan last week, surely the kiss of death from the master minds behind her scheduling.

The hardmen Trinity

There is this image of people who go to Trinity. As rich D4ers who speak highly proper English. The people that Sinn Fein like to call west-brits. The kinds of people who go on about Drico. And talk about being Ghetto while being basically weak wusses. I will admit I had that kind of prejudice as well. So I was walking around Trinity yesterday. and I was watching everyone an they looked like any other college campus in Ireland. However I soon realised they are the toughest people in the country.

Graffiti is a part of any modern campus. It varies slightly from place to place but not really in tone. It can be quiet intimidating. Now I am not that easily intimidated. I mean some years ago when I was threatened to be stabbed in Limerick. I was not intimidated. True it was 8am on a Saturday morning and my would be stabber was cycling a bike with stabilisers up William Street and was only about 8. But still it was Limerick he probably had a knife.

But in trinity I saw possibly the most intimidating thing I have ever seen graffitied. I mean I have been in Bathrooms in NUIG where I was told by arrows pointing at the bottom of the cubicle door to "Beware of limbo dancing Midgets". In Queens in Belfast I was told stuff like the UVF will kill all Fenians

However Trinity tops all that for the sheer hatred and connotations of violence visited upon my person. Shivers ran down my spine as I read

"you smell like a fool"

My image of Triners being wusses has been well and truly shattered they truly are as tough as teak.

Single Issue Candidates.

Back in the day of Dev he tried to get rid of the P.R system of voting in favour of the British First past the post system. He was convinced that is was the source of all the weak governments of the 50s. To make sure that he would get a Yes vote he ran the referendum on the same day as the presidential election hoping that his popularity would result in yes vote. But P.R is widely loved in Ireland. It gives minority parties a voice they would not have in a first past. Considering that they are the only ones that deviate from the centre it is a good thing. But one aspect of the P.R system that is not good for the overall political environment of Ireland is the rise of single issue independents. In 1997 neither coalition had the ability to form a government. So the independents had to be courted. 5 out of the 6 independents (Michael Lowery voted for his old party) were bought by Bertie. He promised them roads and hospitals and loads of investment. The rest of the country saw this. They saw Jakie Healy Rae getting a disproportionate slice of the states cake. So what happen at the next election. 13 independents were elected to the Dail. This was mainly out of greed. They wanted their area to get something that they wanted. They no longer thought that the government should be allowed to make decisions based on the greatest good. They thought they deserved the services more then anyone else. However it backfired and Bertie got loads of seats and no longer needed the independents. They had no power. No speaking rights no way of solving the problems they were elected to fix. So what did they do. They went on reality T.V shows. The funny things is if you look at decentralisation it is quiet clear that parties themselves are not unwilling to give disproportional slices to their own patches. But we still have talk of more single issue candidates. The Rossport 5 were rumoured to be running in the next election and now the relatives of the victims of the stardust tragedy are running. While these peoples issue are the most important to them. Unless we have a hung Dail. They will have absolutely no power to do anything for their people. And the country will have less representatives that will have and support a broad range of ideas that effect us all.

Why Kate Moss proves democracy does not work.

Kate Moss has been voted the most stylish British woman of all time I mean come on one this is a useless survey. But two style is subjective I mean Queen Elizabeth was stylish in her day. But yet again the masses show that they can't be trusted in magazine /telly polls. I mean Robbie Williams got best male singer of all time. Some years ago. Who votes in this kind of thing. It ain't men so I guess I have to leave this answer hanging.

Why Sinn Fein get treated better by the media then any other party

One of the many things that shiners like to speak of is that the media is against them. Nothing could be further from the truth. The media gives Sinn Fein by far the least grilling of any party. I’m sure there are many out there who don’t believe me. And think the Media are unfair to Sinn Fein. That they are “demonising them” that they are “biased” “Paisleyite” and “West Brits”.

But lets look at a few points.

1. Sinn Fein do not consider murdering a member of the Garda Siochana (Irish Police for any foreign readers) wrong. 2. They do not consider the Irish Army as the legitimate army of the state. 3. They do not believe that people of certain ethnic backgrounds have the right to private property. 4. They consider people convicted of training FARC guerrillas heroes 5. They do not recognise the police service of a neighbouring state. 6. They support foreign terrorist organisations 7. Their armed “wing” the IRA committed the largest bank robbery in the history of theses Islands 8. Their armed “wing” tried to cover up the murder of Robert McCartney. Then offered to execute the killers.

So firstly I will deal with point 3. In the Irish Times today with zero comment. It said that at its Ard Feis Sinn Fein decided that “Lands owned by "British aristocratic landlords" in the State should be seized by compulsory purchase orders,” This is the kind of policy Hitler started bringing into Germany against the Jews. This policy is that if someone is of “British aristocratic” ethnicity they don’t have the right to private policy. Considering that Ireland has not been British for 85 years or so. It is highly unlikely that these people who own the land were not born under Irish Rule. But Sinn Fein think that due to their ethnic background they have less rights. This is a fascist policy if there ever was one. Yet do we see the papers criticise them. No. It is a side note in the general Sinn Fein backslapping in the media.

Now such things have been discussed in the media such as the Northern Bank and Robert McCartney but the level of coverage and condemnation that Sinn Fein received was a kin to what Former Minister Michael Lowery got. So lets weigh up the differences. Michael Lowery got a house extension done as payment for a business dealing. Without paying tax. The IRA robbed €38 million. Are these even remotely similar. Why are they dealt with similarly. Michael Lowery appears in the media more then the North bank. Michael Lowery evaded tax in 1996. The Northern Bank raid was just over a year ago. At this rate the Northern Bank raid will be like a myth in 8 years time. The offer from the IRA to execute the killers of Robert McCartney shows that these people have zero respect for Irish morals. People including Sinn Fein talk about the corruption in Fianna Fail. Yet few journalists are asking the questions where is all the IRA’s money going. How is Sinn Fein so well financed? Much of the corruption in Fianna Fail was found out by Frank Connolly. Do I have to spell out why he found corruption in Fianna Fail and not Sinn Fein.

So why does the media act this way. Are they scared. Are they afraid that they will walk down one dark alley to many so day? I think the reason is that Sinn Fein is still seen as a marginalised terrorist party. That they should be encouraged towards peace. This is all well and good. We don’t want to frighten such organisations away from peace. But this is no longer applicable. Sinn Fein are a party that wish to enter into government and “say” they want to pursue purely peaceful politics. This means they should no longer get an easy ride from the press. No longer should the party be not viciously chastised for not recognising the Army of the state. They believe that the murder of a member of the Gardai is “unfortunate”. They say this and people say that is a bad attitude to take. You might think the media’s reaction to Ms Ferris saying it was bad imagine the reaction if Trevor Sergeant said it. Really sit down and think about this.

Seriously clear your mind.

I’ m not joking. Clear your mind.

Is it clear?

Good. Now imagine you are watching Prime Time or the Political Party. Trevor Sergeant is being interviewed. He talks about the Kyoto treaty and Bio Fuel. Then he is asked about the murder of Gerry McCabe. He replies that it was “unfortunate”. Now imagine the reaction of the supposedly anti-Sinn Fein press. Got that imagine in you head.

Now compare that to what happens when Gerry Adams says it. Would the presses reaction be remotely similar. I think not.

Another motion that Sinn Fein support is the removal of the offences against that state. Now I will let Richard Waghorne explain why that is bad. Are the media going to ask Sinn Fein why they want to weaken our defences against terrorist organisations. When the latest IMC report said the likes of the CIRA and RIRA are recruiting. I guess the next few days will tell us that.

Britain is our most important ally. Tony talks to Bertie as much if not more often then he talks to George W. You would think that what ever the make up of the next future government. Whether it is Enda and David. The British Irish Link is going to be very strong. Britain is our largest export partner. Yet Sinn Fein still consider that the British people were legitimate targets. Why is this not been questioned.

The reason I think the media treat Sinn Fein with more leniency then any other party is because they hold every other party to a higher standard. And that attitude had some merit. They were after all not really a democratic party. Yet now they are in the position where they maybe in power. The media can no longer not hold them to the higher standard of the other parties. When they say they move on policing in the North they should not be congratulated for saying “might” they should be vilified for not supporting the rule of law. The era of uneven Sinn Fein coverage needs to end. We need the media to expect Sinn Fein to have the same morals and integrity as every other party.

Where is the Freedom to offend now.

Dec makes a really good point. Many of the arguments about the Cartoons were about the Freedom to offend. Saying they would defend the Freedom to offend. Are they defending David Irvings right to offend people by denying the Holocaust? David Irving is sentenced to three years in prison. The Danish Cartoonists are protected. To me I can see the difference between Irving and cartoonists. But will a Muslim in Iran see it. The real question is where are the right to offend people now?

And the nominees are...

The Irish Blog Award Shortlist is up. Check it out. As expected the Dossing Times did not make it. Ah well. But looking at the competition it would have been a surprise to have been shortlisted.

A Shocking Court Case

If anyone thinks our courts are bad. This has to be the worst verdict I have ever heard of. Italian court: Not a virgin? Sex crimes aren't as serious (hat tip blast furnace canada)

Gerry's speech at ard feis

Love or hate the guy you have to admit Gerry Adams is one of the greatest politicians on this Island. For sheer political genius, charisma and he is by far and away the best orator. With the young shiners on display behind him Gerry Adams took to the podium. For his speech.

After the usual thanks he started of by equating the 1916 rising and the hunger strikers. Both aniversities are coming up soon. One of the deepest desires of the republican movement has been to make the Northern conflict seem as being the same and inextricably linked to 1916-1921. The hunger strikers are the same to the republican movement as the 1916 rising is to the first Dail. The great martyrdom of the troubles. Sands is their Pierce. So to them getting the 1981 hunger strikers legitimised in the eyes of the rest of the country is vital in legitimising the troubles. In the next few months be prepared to hear plenty of sentence containing both 1916 and 1981.

The 1916 rising was a big theme in this speech with Bertie still saying FF can be the heirs of the philosophy of the proclamation. Mr Adams said “These are great words, great ideas, which it is our task to see implemented.” Sinn Fein say they are a socialist party (Tom Cosgrave disagrees). In quiet a dazzling display of political prowess. They highlight the inequality stats and highlight cherishing all of the children of the nation equally“ part of the proclamation to not only attack Fianna Fail on society but also to attack them on 1916 in one move. Karl Rove eat your heart out.

He questioned the use of the army for the 1916 commemoration. Saying that his preference is “An inclusive, civic and cultural celebration, which educates us all, particularly about Irish republicanism,” Has this got more to do with the fact that they don’t recognise the Army. By inclusive Mr Adams does not mean Poles or Nigerians he means Unionists. Considering that nationalist not going to join orange parades that celebrate the Battle of the Boyne. Is it likely that unionist are going to celebrate the 1916 rising? If Unionist are ever going to be integrated into Ireland then we have to accept that we have differences that are never going to be fully solved. We have to accept that they are different suggesting they are not only deepens the devoid.

This is followed with the “five great strategic challenges facing Sinn Féin” The first is implementing the good Friday agreement including the issue of policing. This is nice to see but considering they are not going to join the police boards. We are not going to see this issue resolved in the next year. Next is that they must “engagement with unionism”. Then he called for Sinn Fein to “build support for Irish unity in Britain” considering that they consider that the blowing up Brits was legitimate. I doubt they will find much solidarity in Britain. However with the North’s financial drain on the British exchequer the union probably has never has as little support. Sinn Fein may indeed have something there. However perhaps they should let the SDLP carry the torch on that one. He called also for tackling of the equality in Ireland. Then he point out that “There are more republicans in Ireland today than at any time in our history”. Which is quiet true since our population has not been this high since the 19th century.

Gerry then pointed out “No one should harbour the notion that the republican struggle can be advanced any further by an armed campaign. This leadership is firmly opposed to such a departure”. On this I have to congratulate Mr Adams. It is questionable whether the IRA would have destroyed their weapons without his presence. If Ruairí Ó Brádaigh had remained leader of Sinn Fein who knows what might have happened since.

I have argued before that about the possibility of economic links between North and South and how unionism needs to realise this. Gerry also talks about this. He talks about what has happened the north. “This includes job losses, privatisation, education cuts, falling incomes for those working in agriculture, a failure to produce any strategy to deal with suicide prevention, and much more”. This is interesting the fact that he equates privatisation as a bad thing. Considering that the biggest problem with the Northern Economy is the over reliance on the state. That the states monopoly on talent stifles the economy and that privatisation is the solution. But I will let an economist answer that one.

Gerry mentions that racism needs to be tackled and it is true. But he can start by dealing with it in his own party. They should stop considering calling someone a west Brit an insult. Racism is not just against black people you know. He also states quiet rightly that “The reality of our time is that more money is spent on military projects than on aid or fair trade policies.” Which is quiet true Sinn Fein /Ira have spent more on military projects then on aid or fair trade policies.

Then Mr Adams moves on to issues of the Irish State. He makes excellent points about the Health service and the provision of social housing. Then he takes a dig at everyone’s favourite punch bag builders. Blaming them for the lack of houses. Even though we built more houses last year then ever before in this country. He attacks the government on childcare a real vote getter. Many seats around the country may be decided on this issue. The party with the best plan may be the winner. Sinn Fein’s plan is very strong. However will the voters who accept this accept the tax increases needed to pay for this.

The Irish language is very major part of Irish identity. So Gerry links the 1916 rising and the hunger strikes again to it. More reinforcing of the 1981 part of Irishness. However they do point out that teaching methods need to be improved. Something I think we can all agree on. He attacks the service directive which I don’t know much about so I wouldn’t comment. He also attacks Pat Rabbitte over his migrate stance. Which any reader of mine will know is one of my new pet hobbies.

Again the Swedish model rears it head in Ireland. This time from Gerry. “Sinn Féin would increase taxes on capital gains, property speculation and corporate profits. Of course, our policies will be attacked by those who have mismanaged the boom years of the Celtic Tiger” Funny how he considers the bringing in of the policies that have created the boom is mismanagement. He attacks FF/PD agriculture record. Is this showing signs that Sinn Fein are going to go after the farming vote? Considering that the government have done a good job on farming considering the pressure from Europe. He attacks the new pet hate in the country toll booths. Also the Rossport 5 make an appearance in his speech. He says over the government that “They hand over our natural resources to multi-nationals like Shell”. Considering the cost of exploring and the amount of empty wells that exploration ( Hat tip Gavin) off Irelands coast has yielded. It is highly unlikely that the government could ever have afforded to explore the sea as multinationals have.

Before launching into the final stretch of the speech he makes the ever original brown envelope joke.(edit: 16:55 19/02)He talked of "payments made to crooked politicians by corrupt developers. ".While ignoring payments to corrupt Sinn Fein members by the British Secert Service. (end Edit) Then the section entitled Make partition history. Make partition history has to be one of the most shameful exploitation of a charitable cause ever. Attempting to equate the evils of partition with the evils of world poverty is bad taste to say the least. Bob Geldof must be pissed.

Again the 1916 hunger strikers link is made and it is wound up with a tiocfaigh ár lá. So what do you make of it all. Personnel I think it was a very clever speech. Sinn Fein certainly are setting their stall out as the socialist party in Irish politics. With labour moving to the centre the left is relatively clear. But to fully emerge into the main stream they have to move the troubles more into the mainstream. To legitimise the troubles. The constant reinforcement to the 1916 rising - hunger strikers link is very much part of this. If they can place the hunger strikers into the legacy of 1916 during the next few months commemorations. It will bring a certain legitimacy to Sinn Fein. Then they will be able to move into the mainstream. Whether this happens depends on how everyone reacts to it.

Irish Election Blog

The Irish Election Blog is a small attempt by Irish bloggers to get together and blog the Irish election. Most posts that appear will be cross-posted with the authors own personal blog. It is the intention of the contributors to add unique content to the blog in the run up to the election. It will be interesting to see how will this go. If this will become popular and increase blog readership it could be great. I am going to post some stuff over there. Not sure how much yet. But I'll see how it goes. But check out the site some great bloggers posting there. And Labour Deputy Leader Liz McManus has the introductory post. From the site

If you are a blogger interested in joining this project, email election-2007-at-yahoogroups.co.uk replacing -at- with @. All bloggers are welcome, irrespective of ideology, we just ask that you have some familiarity with Irish politics.

So join up if you wish.

Debate and motions at the Sinn Fein Ard Feis???

I feel really angry with my self. I used the Family Guy "Drive by argument joke" on a post. Now I have a post that can really use it. However forever not caring I am going to repeat the joke. But more about that later. Back in November Sinn Fein suspended Francie Molloy for speak out against party policy. Even though he was reinstated it does show a very small tolerance of dissent. As PS said on Balrog

This is not the case I know myself that debate in encouraged within the confines of the party. I have taken part in debates on policy with other party emembers and we often disagree on certain issues. But, as Francie himself knows, there is a tradition that debate and dissent should be welcomed but left behind closed doors. Unfortunately Francie neglected to respect this tradition this time.

Now Damian Blake on his blog disagreed with some of his party (Fianna Fail) policies and at time of writing he has not been suspended or to my knowledge threatened with suspension. It really does make you wonder. Also Ms Ferris saying she was “not authorised” to comment on Garda Gerry McCabe also makes you wonder are Sinn Fein politicians allowed to comment on anything that hasn’t got prior approval from head office. Is the Ard Feis of any use. Considering they have a policy of “behind closed doors” are they really going to debate much during the Ard Feis in front of the media. Is the only likely true debate going to be drive by arguments

Irishman: I say, Jimmy, isn't that Paddy O’. Neill, the young upstart chap who's been touting the merits of a united free Congo (motion 84) ?

Jimmy: Why begar, tis. Irishman: Oh, let's get him. [They drive up.] Irishman: Oh Paddy... I disagree. [drives off]

But maybe I am doing a disservice to the party members. Maybe they allow debate and Ms Ferris was wrong and Francie Molloy was a case of mistaken identity. Maybe the debate about the future is just that a debate about the Good Friday Agreement and not a ploy to make it seem that Sinn Fein is teetering on the edge of a spilt. In an attempt to make the two governments from fear of a Sinn Fein split act to avert the spilt by pushing Paisley to dance to their tune. Some of the motions are interesting like the one calling for British Ministers to have no role in decision making and then condemn the British for under funding the North. Others like calling for the

“Dublin and London governments to ensure that all loyalist paramilitary groupings follow the example of Oglaigh na hEireann and put arms beyond use forthwith”

Last time I checked Oglaigh na hEireann had all its arms. In fact they had joined new EU battle groups. Yet Sinn Fein (while ignoreing that the other Republican paramilitary’s have all their weapons) showed that this party that wishes to be in government does not recognise the Irish Army. As Oglaigh na hEireann to them is not the Irish Army but the Provisional IRA. A party in government that sees another secret organization as the legitimate army of the state is not a pleasant thought. To me anyway.

Top 6 Friday - My Favourite Cartoon Characters

I've gone for the 6 characters that at the moment i would want to watch given the chance. 6. Bugs Bunny Bugs Bunny is the first on my list at number 6, and nobody else on this list can claim to have been around now for over 60 years. He's also the earliest cartoon character I can remember watching as a child.

Bugs is witty, intelligent, rarely flustered and always one step ahead. He's also arrogant and cocky, but just to the right degree. Crucially, he never initiates the quarrell whether it be against Elmur Fudd, Yosemite Sam, Daffy Duck or Marvin the Martian. Bugs is just happy being Bugs, living his life, eating his carrots, until somebody comes and picks a fight with him. When they do, he responds by humiliating them. That's key.

His influence on popular culture is incredible. He's has one of the most instantly recogniseable faces across the world and his catch phrase is as famous as he is.Bugs was untouchable for well over 60 years, until finally succumbing last year in the Family Guy movie. Still, he had a good run.

5. Zapp 'The Zapper' Brannigan - Futurama Possibly the most suprising entry on my list is Zapp Brannigan or the "Zapper" at number 5. A highly decorated General of DOOP (Democratic order of Planets), Zapp has risen through the ranks to become Earths greatest hero in the year 3000. Most of this appears to have been down to luck with little of it being down to his smarts or ability. His successful military victories include defeating the pacifists of the Ghandi nebula, conquering the Retiree People of the Assisted Living Galaxy, and leading the Earth Army to victory over the Spiderians of Tarantulon 6. (hat tip Wikipedia)

Zapp reminds me a great deal of one of my favourite comedic characters of all time, Inspector Clouseau. Like Clouseau he has risen through the ranks predominantly on luck. He has no true sense of himself, seeing himself as dashing, intelligent, sophisticated, sexy, totally believing his own hype. For example he claims to suffer from a sexy learning disorder, 'sexlexia'. In reality however he is a buffoon, an idiot who is inept in his position but for some reason he gets by and the world is as oblivious to his defects as he is. Such a character has great comedic potential.

He boasts about his sexual conquest of Leela ("Kif, I have made it with a woman. Inform the men") and is determined for a repeat ("But as a gentleman, I must warn you. If you so much as glance at another woman, I'll be all over Leela like a fly on a pile of very seductive manure.").

Oh and he hates neutrals, "I hate these filthy neutrals Kif! With enemies you know where they stand but with neutrals? Who knows! It sickens me."

4. Wile E Coyote - Road Runner Shorts If ever somebody was in need of protections provided to consumers under the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1893, Wile E. Coyote was it. How many times were his brilliant and intricate plans thwarted by substandard Acme products?

I love the Road Runner shorts for a number of reasons. The plot is simple (Coyote chases Roadrunner, but never succeeds), they are incredibly clever and witty and in Wile E. Coyote they have the near perfect anti-hero.

Wile E. Coyote is the first aggressor I can remember rooting for as a child. Of course this was mostly motivated by that smug Roadrunner who was in dire need of being brought down a peg or two. I mean most of the time Roadrunner escapes because of some flaw in Acme equipment and yet he always felt the need to rub salt in the wounds with a "Meep, Meep" before dashing off. Nonetheless, with Coyote, here's a guy who is doomed to fail but he never relents and kept coming up with these incredile schemes to reach his goal.

He's the epitomone of the mantra "if at first you don't succeed..." Creator Chuck Jones once proclaimed that "Wile E. is my reality, Bugs Bunny is my goal", I can relate.On top of that, he's flat out hilarious.

3. Stewart Gilligan Griffin - Family Guy I resolved at the start of this list not to include two characters from the same show. Stewie wins over Peter simply because I cannot remember seeing another character similar to Stewie. A one year old American sexually ambiguous baby genius, who speaks with a British accent, and who's goals in life is to kill his mother and rule the planet.

Yes, Stewie is nothing if not the a-typical infant. Stewie slowly descended into insanity in the 9 months he spent trapped in his mothers womb. To pass the time he kept a diary ("Day 171: I've sprouted another finger. Counting the one from yesterday, I'm up to 11"). He also spent his 9 months plotting the destruction of Europe and was followed out of the womb by several maps, marking major European cities.

Stewie like most great characters is a bunch of oxymorons. He's suave and sophisticated, reading the Wall Street journal. He's cool, with obscure pop culture references aplenty (witness his hilarious parody of William Shatner singing Rocketman). He also dreams of world domination.

All this from a baby, who requires adult assistance to change his diapers. Brilliant.

2. Eric Theodore Cartman - South Park I was relatively slow to "get" the appeal of South Park. As far as I could tell all the hype was over one of the characters dying every week and 8 year old kids swearing. No big deal. Then I saw Eric Cartman feed Scott Tenorman's parents to him in some chilli because of a dispute over pubes and all that changed.

"You guys, you guys, Guess what?"

Cartman is quiet simply the most selfish, spolit, racist, anti-semitic, ill tempered, manipulative and flat out evil 8 year old ever to appear on TV. And the funny thing is, you can't help but love the guy! Like Wile E. Coyote, Cartman is the anti-hero, the guy you shouldn't root for but can't help it. (It helps that he and I share a mutual contempt for hippies though!)

He is capable of innocence and shocking evilness. For example in the episode with Scott Tenorman alluded to above, Cartman thought he could beat Stan and the rest to puberty by buying some 'pubes' from an older boy, Scott. When he finds out that his newly acquired pubes are useless in that respect he hatches a diabolic scheme of revenge which ends up with Scott eating his own parents.

South Park in recent years has evolved into one of the finest political and social commentary shows on TV. It has improved year by year and its as funny as hell. Nonetheless, Cartman carrys the show, with episodes suffering when he is not at, or close to, the centre of the action.

Trying to pick a favourite Cartman moment is flat out impossible. Watch some episodes if you don't believe me. He is also responsible for some of the most shockingly un-P.C one liners I have ever heard. My favourite would probably be when he's trying to offload a bunch of aborted foetuses for stem cell research. As he haggles for the best price he declares:

"Oh plehease! Okay, you tell me where you can get aborted fetuses for seventy cents on the dollar? You tell me, Chuck? ...Yeah, I didn't think so-You know, I'm just like the fetuses, Chuck. I wasn't born yesterday, either. Uh huh. ...So are you gonna talk to me, or are we just gonna keep bullshitting each other? Breakin' my balls, Chuck."

1. Homer J. Simpson - The Simpsons Anybody who knows me, knows my affection for the greatest TV show in history, and the greatest cartoon character I've had the pleasure to watch. Homer quiet simply is the greatest. He's far and away the biggest reason I will watch an episode of the Simpsons time and time again and still find it funny. Whilst he's not as funny as he used to be he's still the man.

If I start talking here about Homer, I might not be able to stop. For some reason my head is an encyclopedia of scenes, quotes with him. Again ask anybody who knows me. If only it was as easy to memorise facts and figures at school! He's the only father I know of who uses examples of hitting a referee with a whisky bottle to explain emotions to his kids. He gives advice like "Trying is the first step toward failure" and he has an encyclopedic knowledge of the code of the schoolyard. All entries in my Top 6 Simpsons episodes featured Homer heavily. That says all I need to say about Homer.

Homer Simpson, my favourite cartoon character of all time!

Honourable Mentions: Dangermouse, Pinky & the Brain, Tom & Jerry, Daffy Duck, Peter Griffin, Bart Simpson, Butters Stotch, Batman, Ralph Wiggum, Adam West, Marvin the Martian, Taz, Bender, Mutley.

Paris Hilton to play Mother Teresa

I am with United Irelander on this I don't know what to say. Other then is it the first of April all ready.

Next US president, Northern Ireland and other US polls

Just looking through some of the polling data on the next president. Looks like Rudy Giuliani at this stage would win the election. If he went. I always find polls interesting. Here is another poll from the same site. Seemingly in 1998 50% of Americans favored a United Ireland. While 17% favored remaining part of the UK. Seemingly 30% of Americans see Canada more as another State then another country. Very interesting site check it out.

Apartheid returns to Africa, Corruption remains

Apartheid is one of the worst crimes black people have to endure in the 20th century. But now it looks like Zimbabwe want to do the same to white people. From South Africa’s Mail & Guardian

“Banks in Zimbabwe must not enter into contracts with white commercial farmers without asking the government first, the official Sunday Mail reported. National Security Minister Didymus Mutasa said some financial institutions were "denying new [black] farmers loans ... on the basis that the white commercial farmers had title deeds of the farms as collateral," the paper reported.”

This is part of along series of measures brought in by Robert Mugabi to slowly remove democracy and white people's rights from Zimbabwe. He is cracking down on the media. Shuting down independent newspapers and arresting journalists saying (From NY Times)

The journalists were "driven by the love for the United States dollars and British pounds, which they are paid by the foreign media houses to peddle lies,"

In an interesting case of irony. In 1983 Emmerson Mnangagwa, then Minister of State Security (From this is Zimbabwe)

He told a rally at the Victoria Falls that the government was considering as one option the burning down of “all villages infested with dissidents”. The dissidents were, in his words, “cockroaches” and 5 Brigade was the “DDT” brought in to eradicate them

DDT was a famous chemical that cause a lot of damage to the environment it was used in. Same to for the Zanu PF's rule of Zimbabwe. Inflation in Zimbabwe in January was a spectacular 613% compared to neighbouring Zambia at 12% and a GDP growth of -4%. Back in 2000 inflation was 50%. This is due mainly to Mugabi's policies. Like many countries in Africa white people controlled much of the decline in Zimbabwe’s economic collapse has been Mugabe’s policies of forced seizure of White owned land. Land redistribution has always been an issue in Zimbabwe since independence. It started on a voluntary selling basis which didn’t work as few sold. Then in 1992 it changed to a forced selling basis but with fair compensation. This was widely corrupt and the land merely went to cabinet ministers and other cronies. Because of this Britain then stopped its aid to the land reform programme. In 2000 the government staged a referendum to pass a constitution that would allow the acquiring of land compulsorily without compensation. The Government lost but supporters seized land anyway. Now there is 300 white farmers left farming in Zimbabwe, down from more than 4 000 in 2005. While white farmers have their land is due to colonial rule the manner in which Mugabe is going about rectifying this is counter-productive. By destroying the agricultural sectors viability he is in essence making the Black population less well off then before. And the country has severe fuel and food shortages. Protestors against the government are stoped. On Tuesday 159 women and students marching for bread and roses were arrested and jailed including a 0ne-year old baby. In May of 2005 he started Operation Murambatsvina" (Drive Out Trash) hundreds of thousands of poor peoples homes were destroyed. (From Wikipedia)

The Zimbabwean Police Commissioner, Augustine Chihuri, said that Operation Murambatsvina was meant to “clean the country of the crawling mass of maggots bent on destroying the economy”

So will anything be done to halt Mugabe.The easiest option is for the South African Government to put pressure on Mugabe. As Economist, Tom Hawkin said of South African President Thabo Mbeki (From Disillusioned Lefty)

"If he wants to, he can force Zanu-PF to the negotiating table, the exit package, free and fair elections" It's just that he appears not to want to, or lacks the conviction that this is what he should do but the South Africans seems unwilling to do this.

(From BBC)

South Africa's Foreign Minister Nkosazana Dlaminini Zuma said South Africa would "never" condemn its Zimbabwean counterpart. "It is not going to happen as long as this government is in power," she told journalists.

So unless there is a change of government in South Africa. Which considering the main opposition has 12.4% of the vote compared to the ANC's 69.7 % . Thats not going to happen any time soon so little is going to be done. The next avenue is the African Union but considering that the actions of Mugabe are not uncommon in other African countries they are unlikely to act. The unwillingness to act was vocalised by an AU spokesman who said (From BBC)

If the government that they elected say they are restoring order by their actions, I don't think it would be proper for us to go interfering in their internal legislation,"

Zimbabwe has left the commenwealth so it has little influence in this situation. (I wrote about the Commenwealth here) The next port of call for action as always is the UN. Now as I pointed out over Iran the UN is weak due to other countries self interests. China is investing heavily in many African countries and Zimbabwe is no different. It is Zimbabwe’s biggest foreign investor and eager to get its hand on the worlds second largest platinum exporters stock. It is also the supplier of the radio-jamming equipment that the government uses to suppress the radio media. So the likelihood of China supporting the ousting of Mugabe is slim to none and slim just left town.

So then we are left with every anti-war peaceniks bogeyman a “Coalition of the Willing”. From (The Washington Post)

David Coltart, an opposition member of parliament, said Zimbabwe has been on the Bush administration's radar screen, even if not the president's. "George Bush is too preoccupied by Iraq to be personally engaged in the Zimbabwe crisis," he said. "But Colin Powell certainly was a friend of those struggling to bring democracy. It's too early to say whether Condoleezza Rice is focused on Zimbabwe."

In October Mugabe speaking at a UN meeting said (From BBC)

"Must we allow these men, the two unholy men of our millennium, who in the same way as Hitler and Mussolini formed [an] unholy alliance, form an alliance to attack an innocent country?" asked Mr Mugabe, apparently referring to Iraq. "The voice of Mr Bush and the voice of Mr Blair can't decide who shall rule in Zimbabwe, who shall rule in Africa, who shall rule in Asia, who shall rule in Venezuela, who shall rule in Iran, who shall rule in Iraq," he said

Was this a pre-emptive strike against the likely main instigators of his ousting. His only hope would be to develop enough international sentiment against this. But other then China I can not see any country rally to his side. I see 4 future outcomes.

1. South Africa gets its act together
2. The people will no longer tolerate his corrupt and catastrophic rule and rise up and topple him.
3. A coalition of the willing lead by America or South Africa will either invade, topple or encourage and help option 2
4. He will die. The man is 82 on the 21^st. So this is the most likely scenario. Will his successor follow in his footsteps and reform. Is another question.

But I think Mugabe’s days are numbered. This can only be a good thing for all people in Zimbabwe.

Cartoon from here

Vote in Blog awards and win

Damien Mulley has announced that O2 are sponsoring I-mode phones as prizes if people vote in the Blog Awards. So please go vote Dossing Times (if you think we are worth it) and maybe you will win a phone. Voting ends Friday

Sean Haughey who does he think he is.

From RTE

The TD, who had been widely tipped for promotion, told RTE‰ News he believed he was best placed for the post and he was baffled by the decision not to appoint him. Mr Haughey said while he accepted that such appointments were entirely at the discretion of the Government, the decision indicated that he was unlikely to secure the higher office which would enable him to represent his constituents at the level they deserved.

Translation: Enable me to get the job I think I deserve. Also with talk of him moving to the PD's which would be spectacular considering the way his father treated Des O' Malley. This guy is a pure self-serving opportunist in my opinion. Just shows you the apple does fall far from the tree.

Hope for the Middle East

The always interesting Lebanon an Irish Experience through the bottom of a glass Has a great piece about the recent events in Lebanon.

MacDara was witness to a people at their best, Young and old, Christian , Druze and Muslim were all there to remind the politicians that it is there country and that they want to live together in peace and prosperity.

Lebanon is really showing the middle east how the future can be bright.

A drive-by arguement with....

Richard Waghorne of Sicilian Notes said

I don't have a problem with inequality, either of income or of opportunity, though I believe people are far better off in a free society rather than a planned society in any case.

Not so long ago Michael McDowell said that Inequality was good for the Economy. And people were like “how dare he”. “You can’t say that” “we are Irish we love each other equally” “we cherish each child of the state equally”. He is the minister for Justice Equality and Law reform he is suppose to lax lyrically about equality and yadda yadda yadda.

Few I think actually realised that he is right. Inequality is good for the economy in some ways. And everyone who is out there shocked at what McDowell said is glad of inequality.

I have argued before the case for a high minimum wage which I still stand by. But there is a limit to the height it will go can go before it will start price inflation. At a certain point the increased consumer spending will not compensate for a business costs so prices will rise. Thus as prices rise people will be getting less “value for money” then before and demand wage increases and thus creating loads of problems and job losses. (Edit Cause high inflation as well thus starting a vicious cycle)

The fact of the case is that to control inflation and give people the “value for money” they so crave we need inequality in the economy. Before anyone yells at me what about the Swedish model. Read this. Then you can yell away.

However in other ways inequality is not good for the economy. We are going to be a knowledge economy so we need to excel at it. That means every child should have equal access to education, health and an equal opportunity in life. It should not matter if a parent can pay to send their kids to a top school the free school needs to be as good. If it is not and rich kids get a better education then poor kids our economy will decline. We can not have a type of inbreed intellectual elite in this country coming from the same social strata(inbreed from a limited pool of people). Our economy needs the best of the best not the best of the rich. And with that then people will be better off.

So Richard. I disagree. neeeeeeeeeeumm
(if anyone doesn't get the family Guy Reference For Shame get thee to the DVD store)

Is Michael D talking lessons from Sinn Fein

Last night on Questions and Answers (watch here) Michael D Higgins said that Pat Rabbitte's remarks about 40 million poles was unfortunate. Is that not what Sinn Fein say of the killing of Garda Jerry McCabe. That is was unfortunate. Is this the kind of dodging the question spin we have to put up with in Ireland. Do we not deserve more!

Is Northern Ireland's future success on a North-South basics or East-West basics

In the past few elections the SDLP has been taking a hammering in the Northern Elections with Sinn Fein engineering themselves into the position where they say they are the true Irish party. So the SDLP have been trying to claim back this territory for themselves last year they had their White paper on Irish Unity. Now they have a document about North South Co-operation.

The DUP have an alternative East-West proposal. As DUP MEP Jim Allister said.

“Bearing this reality in mind, the most obvious and natural area of co-operation is co-operation undertaken on an east-west basis, rather than the unnatural and politically-motivated north-southery”

Personally I think both of these proposals are more politically motivated then serious proposals to enhance the North. But what of the question which is better for the North. A North-South link or a East-West link.

The DUP’s first point is about tourism. Yet none of it really says why tourist links are needed to be created with Scotland to implement there proposals. Other then selling to a Scottish market. Their proposals are quiet good with such ideas as promoting leisure ports i.e. pleasure boating but they don’t say why Scottish co-operation is needed on this issue. They don’t talk about people sailing between ports in Antrim and West Scotland. So why co-operation is needed for this I don’t know. The idea of attracting Ulster-Scot American ancestor hunters is a good one. But are they going to be moving between Scotland and the North. On the other hand as Ireland is a single island. It is possible to sell it as a complete package for one simple reason. You can get a train to Belfast from Dublin but not from Belfast to Edinburgh. To go to Scotland you have to fly or go by sea. If you promote to people an Ulster-Scotland tour you have to tell them ,of the need to cross the sea and organise ferry or flight passage etc. However on an all Island bases they can travel where they want by just turning up at the bus/train/car rental depot and get where they want to go. Tourist want hassle free touring. A North South tour is less hassle then a east-west.

Next the DUP take about road infrastructure co-operation. Now no where in the plan do they talk about building a bridge between the North and Scotland So I don’t really get the need to co-operate on road building. Their calls for more Ferries and plans is a good idea. Now on the Ireland side. It is quiet obvious why road co-operation needs to take place. Because the roads join. I mean what use would the M1 be if it joined a small by-road south of the border or the other way around. So it makes sense for North-South road co-operation.

Then the proposals stop. I think this document was put together quiet quickly really as it does very little about economic development. But I will continue on with the comparison. If we compare the two economies Ireland and Scotland. We see two different stories. Now I will not bore you with the details that you already know about the Celtic Tiger. But the Scottish economy is in an entirely different animal with the state accounting for 55% of the economy while the country has about 2% growth(growth in Northern Ireland is 3% and in ROI is 5.5%). Like the North the state props up the economy is this something that the North should look towards integrating closer with. Something it wants to model itself on. From the Scotsman

Alan Mitchell of CBI Scotland said: "To have that much of the economy generated by wealth spending rather than wealth creating can't be good for the Scottish economy long term.”

The same goes for the Northern economy if they want to survive long term they have to wean themselves off the British exchequer. Maybe this is the DUP’s plan to make the country totally dependent on London’s pockets and the union will always be secure. But if they want the country to advance economically they need to adapt a new model. One highly successful model is on their doorstep in the South. While they could try every lefties wet dream the “Swedish Model” if cross border co-operation on economic factors started they would have a wealth of experience to tap in to. So economically North-South as opposed to east-west makes sense to me anyway.

Now some of the policies the SDLP came up with can be taken or leaven and they would work on an North-South, east-west basis even some like The development of an all-Ireland approach to suicide prevention should possibly be implemented on a British-Irish level However I can see where some policies would bother unionists. Such as the ability of cross-border workers being able to pay tax in either jurisdiction. Now I am not sure how many cross-border workers there are. But the prospect of money being brought out of the Northern Ireland exchequer to go to Ireland is a valid concern as it would effect the North’s ability to pay for services. Also the prospect of the all-Ireland police intelligence agency probably worries them as much as the thought of the PSNI running intelligence in the south is to us.

On the whole North-South co-operation on issues such as tourism, transport, waste disposable and economy makes sense. Much more sense then the East-West co-operation. But we have to thread carefully on this issue. Unionist sensibilities are as valid as Nationalist sensibilities they have to be shown that this is the prudent and wise thing to do. Not forced into it to appease Nationalists. The south is desperate for workers the North has them and as Northern Secretary Peter Hain said the North and the South “must work together to prosper”. Perhaps Scotland too should realise the direction they are heading in and reform along the lines of the Irish model. Then maybe the East-West co-operation the DUP envisage would produce a positive outcome for Northern Ireland.

Perception is the clash of civilisations.

I’m a physicist by education and few of you have actually meet me. So in your mind what do you imagine me to be like. Do you see a pimpled guy with glasses who looks like Professor Frink from the Simpson. Who has an encyclopaedic knowledge of every episode of Star Trek. Or do you see a Brad Pitt look alike. I guess the answer is a lot closer to Frink then to Brad. Yet I do not wear glasses, have pimples nor have I ever watch an episode of star trek from beginning to end. I will leave the Frink vs Brad looks comparison to your imagination.

The vast majority of physicist I know do not fall into the Frink school of physicist appearance and actions. So why do you have this image of physicist. Simple because that is the perception of physicist people have through years of TV newspapers and other media.

Now while the perception people have about physicists can give me a unique edge over lets say accountants on nights out.:-) (I have been asked to explain the theory of special relativity by girls I have been chatting up for some reason) This same warping of perception is damaging worldwide peace.

If you ever read some American blogs you get to see how Muslims are seen by many Americans. They see them as a violent people, intent on the destruction of truth, justice the American way and sesame street. They saw 9/11, Madrid, 7/7 and suicide bombings in Israeli cafes. They look at violent protests over cartoons published in an obscure Danish newspaper. All they see is death and destruction caused in the name of Islam.

In Islamic countries the west is disliked . They see Islamic countries been invaded by western forces. They see American culture attempting to crush their culture. They hear the west talk about decency, then they see British Troops beating up teenagers. They hear the west talk about tolerance and then see the Danes shiting on their religion. They see America support Israel subjugation of the Palestine. All they see is death and destruction cause in the name of the west.

So the perception both sides see is of a clash of civilisations. It doesn’t matter if it is happening on a large scale or not it is perceived to be. The British army were originally greeted by nationalist but after a while due to the actions of a few the perception changed and rightly or wrongly they became the devil incarnate. This too ,will happen to the British army in Iraqi over the News of the world video. The actions of a few will demonise all.

So why is the west and Islam turning into each others respective bogey men. In Syria there is no protest without government permission. So this means that the protests in Syria were approved of if not organised by the government. If you look at the North how many people would have spoken out against the IRA. Since the decommissioning of weapons the McCartney sisters have had to leave the Short Strand. This kind of atmosphere exists in most of the countries of the middle east. You can not speak-out against the regime. So is it not beyond the bounds of possibility that many of the demonstrators were forced into protesting rather then having a violent hatred of all things Danish. The same goes for many other countries that had protests. With the Iranian government calling for all sorts of things against Europe.

With massive unemployment, corruption, and poor services. The governments are all very much in danger of being toppled. They all fear a cedar revolution. So what do they do. Invest in the country, open up trade, no they solidify their power by creating a common enemy. Like in Orwell’s 1984 if you tell them something often enough use what ever means are necessary to divert their attention from the true state of the country. Then patriotism will win out and the ineptitude of the government will hidden and they will come to love big brother.

Perception is distorting the worlds view of each other. Creating an even greater divide between us and the Arabs. This is not the fault of the media. They can not make up the pictures of the riots nor can they make up the pictures of the British soldiers beating up Iraqi teenagers. It is up to people to have enough cop on to separate reality from perception.

Little Green Footballs Attack Mary McAleese

The pinnacle of American debate that is the Little Green Footballs don't like Mary . With such choice comments as "you ignorant biotch" "She doesn't mean it, the infidel tart". "CAN WE START BOMBING THESE IRISH BASTARDS NOW?" They use loyalist sites as a source of facts. Which is a bit like using www.hamas.com for facts on Israel. They have also come up with such well researched facts as.

Oh, well. What do you expect from Nazi sympathizers? the Irish, I mean. They hated England so much they sided with Hitler in WW II.

Slogan explanation.

I think Carlsberg used to say the "Carlsberg the best best in the World" but had to change it to "Carlsberg probably the best best in the World" as they couldn't prove that is was the best beer in the world. This is why Toyota can still say "the best built cars in the world". Hat tip(Damien Mulley)

Blogs add a new dimension to physics

Article from this months Physics World. Also in this months Physics World The mystery of the skipping stone And an article about a better way of destroying plutonium by burning it with thorium. This article is however not online I think.

Blog Abortion Poll results

I regret the yes in extreme cases option now I feel it should have been a straight yes no vote. I'll stop the vote now as the Irish Debate seems to be over. Anyway the results. Yes 16 votes Yes in extreme cases 8 No 8 So pretty even really I would say. I don't think I actually voted in the poll in the end :-).

How the Green Party can get farming votes

The Green party traditionally has not been seen in the best light by framers. As farmers are against such things as the Nitrates Directive which the Greens are for. But there is sections where the Greens policies can attract some farming votes.

One of the green parties policies is renewable energy. I am totally in favour of it not for cutting emissions reasons but to lessen the control of Russian gas on our country. Now Wind power is never going to solve our problems. If we built enough wind farms to provide our power needs then we would alter our weather patterns. As the winds energy would be reduced. So in effect by implementing a system of wind farms to halt climate change would actually change the climate. On the greens website it says. “Bio fuels the fuels of the future”. If this is sold right to the farming organisations can really boost the greens rural vote. They need to say to farmers that if the Green Party is in power that they will implement policies to move Bio Fuels up the agenda and thus create a new profitable market for farmers to enter. With the demise of the sugar beet industry that many farmers blame Fianna Fail for the greens may be able to capture some of those votes by saying they can provide a new market.

Irish farmers are dependent on CAP and it is going to go. This is going to devastate the Irish market. Unless they can come up with another commercially viable product farming in this country will be gone. With GM crops in larger African and South American countries where they will have economies of scale and cheap wages we simply will not be able to compete. But if we create a GM free island then we can successfully sell this label to the entire organic cotton wearing Jamie Oliver loving crowd. The people who will eat organic and GM free foods are the people who can afford to pay well for it and they will. Thus to maintain rural Irelands viability we need to keep GM crops off this Island. Simply saying GM crops are bad is going to be seen by farmers as a direct attack on their livelihoods the Green party need point out how CAP is going to go and how they are the only ones with a option for farmers.

If the Green Party want to expand they have to appeal to more then the trendy lefties who drive SUV’s to the shops to buy organic vegetables. They need to appeal to the closest people to the Irish environment the farmers. They need to do more then just give out about the present minister. They need to publicises how they have novel options. If they don’t do it soon someone else will.

Terrorism a state of mind

New Blogger J.D Vega said of the war on terror.

Now, bear with me for a moment, but to declare war on a state of mind seems like a bit of an uphill struggle. Unlike the 'War on Drugs' or declaring war on a particular country, where there is a tangible target...You can show a picture of your enemy on the news and say 'We must defeat this enemy', there is no defense against terrorism, there is no way to hunt it down and kill it(no matter how many Afghan caves you look in)

And it has got me thinking. Can you really win a war on terror. If you look at the North the IRA was not defeated in battle while it was weakened by spies etc the Omagh bomb showed that there was still people ready to murder to advance the republican cause. America seems to think that getting Osama will stop the war but if you look at the last two attacks in Madrid and London it was not organised by Osama. You cannot defeat terror solely by killing. True you can eliminate the ring leaders in a hope that the organisation might fall. But if the mind set, the idea, the state of mind still exists to use terrorism then no amount of bombs, armies, fighter jet can ever defeat terrorism. As terrorism is not a tangible thing it is a state of mind. To defeat terrorism you must win the battle for the hearts and minds. Looking at the violence over the Danish cartoons it is clear the we are not the ones winning the hearts and minds of the islamic world.

Search engines referrals

On behalf of the dossing times crew I would like to apologies to the person who came to the dossing times via the msn search engine looking for pictures of the greatest position to have orgasmic sex. We are not willing to part with that information at this point and time. But we do hope that you find true happiness in that position when you discover it. You got to love wacky search engine referrals.

Top 6: Reasons to Watch the Oscars

For many when we consider the Oscars, the backslapping, predictability, tiresome acceptance speeches and dominance of mainstream fare can be a turn off. However this year there are some indicators to give us hope that the beautiful people have some taste.

6: Charlize Theron: This woman gets dowdy and serious for films full of angst and turmoil (‘Monster’- psychotic lesbian killers, ‘North Country’- sexual harassment in mines) but when she turns up for gigs like the Oscars she looks dam fine and exudes the type of sexiness that inspires men, women and cosmetic marketers the world wide (Go Rent: ‘The Devils Advocate’).

Honourable Mention: Reese Witherspoon, for every ‘Just Like Heaven’ and ‘Legally Blonde 2’, this girl has made ‘Election’ and ‘Best Laid Plans’.

5: This is the first of the Award Season shows that have acknowledged ‘Munich’, a spectacle in film making, a story of ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances, my favourite type of story telling. After Martin Scorcese, Spielberg is one of the most neglected Hollywood directors, then again Alfred Hitchcock never won an Oscar so there are no guarantees. Munich not being considered in the other awards shows throws up an element of much welcome unpredictability.

4: George Clooney, this is the man who after ‘The Peacemaker’ and ‘One Fine Day’ was condemned to lists of stars who failed to make the transfer from TV to movies. After Batman and Robin he was condemned to lists of stars who ended film franchises. Now working both behind and in front of the camera the man’s acting talents, writing and directing are each being acknowledged. I look forward to ‘Good Luck and Good Night’ and ‘Syriana’, much respect is due for his bravery in making a film about real issues and also respect is due for his CV since ‘Batman and Robin’- ‘O Brother Where Art Thou?’, ‘Oceans 11’ and ‘Confessions of A Dangerous Mind’. In any other year where a gay cowboy movie had not received 8 nominations, his 3 nominations would be the big story of these Oscars.

3: Philip Seymour Hoffman: I first became aware of this man’s talent in ‘State and Main’ and while David Mamet cannot help but have every line of his scripts be pure gold, Hoffman gave them life playing a charming, funny and intelligent character. Too often his roles (‘Red Dragon’, 'Boogie Nights') are supporting ‘character’ roles so I’m glad that he has been given the chance to shine in ‘Capote’ and even more glad that he has received kudos for it. I am intrigued as to the movies concept of putting context to his novel ‘In Cold Blood’ which is one of those books that will stay with me forever. If time allows read it before you see this movie and watch a star in the ascendant on Oscar night. I want people to talk about Hoffman the way they talk about Spencer Tracy today.

Honourable Mention: Matt Dillon’s Best Supporting Actor nomination for his role in ‘Crash’, not since his threesome with Neve Campbell and Denise Richards in ‘Wild Things’ has the man been involved in such an inspiring performance.

2. The greatest surprise in hearing the nominations was the acknowledgement of ‘Crash’. I truly regret not putting this movie on the Top 6 movies of the year post from last year. SPOILER: Only the other day when watching the news and the disheartening developments in the violence following the publishing of cartoons in print media, I thought of the scene following the break in to a family’s grocery store, the break-in is clearly racially motivated, the presumption of the criminal based on graffiti left and of the viewer to this point is that the shop owners are Muslim and the attacks follow on from tensions since 9/11. Of course them we have the gutwrenching revelation from the mother that they are in fact a Hindu family and we realise that these people have been punished because of the colour of their skin and how they dress with no understanding of their belief system. The message resonates through to current events. END SPOILER. Also Paul Haggis, the writer/director (and writer of ‘Million Dollar Baby’) was behind one of my favourite TV shows, ‘Due South’ so I’m glad to see the man hit the big time.

Honourable Mention: Paul Giamattis nomination for ‘Cinderella Man’, the film otherwise has been criminally over looked.

1.The greatest surprise in the organising of the Oscars has been the announcement that the show will be presented by Jon Stewart, presenter and producer of ‘The Daily Show’. All credit to Chris Rock but he sucks, he served as a male Whoopi Goldberg with less lesbian innuendo which is never a good thing. I am looking forward to Stewart’s hosting duties being the only thing anyone will talk about the morning after the show. If you have not seen ‘The Daily Show’ I guarantee you will seek it out the following evening and relish his diatribe. The in your face theatrics of Michael Moore caused nothing but unease and tension 3 years ago, now the time is ripe for the intelligent commentary and humour that this man delivers in spates. This man injects some humour into the ridiculousness of our world, I enjoy that relief.

Watch March 6th.

The Irish Politics of Fear

I was watching the documentary "The power of nightmares"(you can watch it here) the other day. Basically what it tells is an interesting but very biased story about how the Neo conservatives in America and Al-Qaeda used fear to get people to vote for them. Very basically it is a Orwellian concept based on the teachings of Leo Strauss. In the book 1984 the government use the idea that the country is at war to keep the people under control. This is what the documentary said the Neo-Cons were doing by making people believe not in ideals but in nightmares (i.e soviet Union under Regan and Al-Qaeda under Bush) they could make people believe that they alone can save them from the treat.

But it is not just in America that the politics of fear is being used to gain support from people here too in Ireland all the parties use fear to garner votes. Some more blatantly then others

Fianna Fail has always been the most powerful party in the country. Other then Cumann na nGheadheal no other party has ever been in a single party government. Yet they have a fear and they are using this fear to gain votes. One of the big fears a lot of people have in this country is to have Sinn Fein in government. The prospect of having murders who are not repentant at the cabinet table is not something that many people relish. So afraid that Fianna Fail will lose their Republican base they are trying to reclaim that ground with such things as 1916 Commeration parades. Fianna Fail make people believe that they alone can hold off Sinn Fein taking all the republican votes. They say vote for us as we are the only ones that can halt the rise of Sinn Fein.

Fine Gael are trying to appeal the people who are afraid of rip-off Ireland. The people that feel they are being robbed blind by stealth taxes. That the tax man is behind lurking every corner just waiting to take all your cash and siphon it off to some rich property developer. They gave birth to the www.ripoff.ie website and wished had gave birth to Eddie Hobbs. On the rip off website Fine Gael say

For over two years we have been lifting the lid on Rip Off Ireland. On everything from soft drinks to mobile phones, houses to funeral costs we have been highlighting the high cost of living in Ireland and coming up with radical, workable solutions that will shut the door on Rip Off Ireland once and for all.

They say vote for us as we are the only ones that can save you from the stealth taxman.

Labour’s exploit the greatest fear of many now in Ireland have. Xenophobia. Anecdotal evidence is portrayed as facts and the country is made believe foreigners are coming here to take Irish peoples jobs. They are starting a race to the bottom. And there is more waiting to come, to invade. Pat Rabbitte articulated this in saying “There are 40 million poles you know” and few in the party have disagreed publicly. They try to defend their liberal morality flank with talk of labour inspectors but really they are taping into the fear of foreigners to increase their vote. They say vote for us as we are the only ones that can save you from foreigners taking your job.

The PDs participation in government was secured by a picture of Michael McDowell putting up a poster saying Single party government No thanks. They used peoples fear of a majority Fianna Fail government by portraying the PDs as the only party that can stop a single party government and “keep an eye on Fianna Fail”. However this time round with the possibility of another single party government is remote. So they are changing their tactic. They claim that they are available for both coalitions and that the people of Ireland would want them in to keep an eye on things. They claim that economic progress is not guaranteed and is solely due to their vision and policies. The fact that Charlie McCreevy was from Fianna Fail does not stop them as they eagerly point out that he greatly influenced the parties policies when they formed and thus their policies is what and will continue to keep the country booming. They say vote for us as we are the only ones that can save the economy from ruin.

The Greens operate on fears. Few people know where they stand any issue that are not environmental which is probably a fault of their own. They say vote for us as we are the only ones that can save you from global warming/nuclear power/incinerators/peak oil/GM crops/Russian gas/landfill sites/Kyoto fines.

Sinn Fein has always been one of the smoothest political operators in the business. What other party with a terrorist group can gain as much support. What parties terrorist wing can commit the largest bank robbery in the history of the Irish isles (I ain’t calling it the British Isles) and get a bump in the opinion polls. What parties terrorist group can kill one of their own and cover it up and not suffer for it. This is all due to the political genius of Gerry Adams. So their political strategy is going to be as brilliant as it is subtle. Basically Sinn Fein exploit the fear of themselves. As Pastor of Muppets said about the North.

Once the violence was switched off, Irish nationalism was greatly attracted to Sinn Féin. Many long-term SDLP supporters freely gave their votes to the republican movement, if only to encourage them along a peaceful route.

This is part of what Sinn Fein do down south. They say vote for us as we are the only ones that can save Ireland from us.

Then we have the independents, Sinn Fein and the SWP working at a local level. They zone in to an issue that people have in the area. They make people fear that they are being left behind by the Celtic tiger, fear someone is doing better then you by employing unfair means. They say vote for us as we are the only ones that can make you heard.

Now many of the parties are exploiting real fears others are phantom fears. Some parties exploit the same fears such as fear of Sinn Fein. Some exploit peoples fear more then others. The program suggested that the people with the darkest fear will have the most power. Now this is probably not true in Ireland but maybe the people with the greatest fear will gain the most in the next election.

Chicken saved by mouth to beak CPR

Chicken saved by mouth-to-beak CPR

A retired nurse saved her brother's chicken, Boo Boo, by administering mouth-to-beak resuscitation last week after the fowl was found floating face down in the family's pond. Marian Morris said she hadn't had any practice with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in years, but she was interested to see if she "still had it". "I breathed into its beak, and its dadgum eyes popped open," Morris said. "I breathed into its beak again, and its eyes popped open again. I said, 'I think this chicken's alive now. Keep it warm.'" She said she did not know how to find a pulse on a chicken. Boo Boo's owners, Jackie and Becky Calhoun, put her in a large cardboard box containing a grain feeder and water. They also placed a heater nearby. The chicken is called Boo Boo because she is easily frightened. The Calhouns thought Boo Boo was startled and flopped into the pond. -- Sapa-AP

This reminds me of the episode of the Simpsons. With the guinea pig and the vet.

Cartoon wars the revenge

From brussels journal. In belgium the Arab European League has published some cartoons in response to the Danish cartoon

The first cartoon, posted on Friday evening, shows Anne Frank in bed with a naked Adolf Hitler. “Write this one in your diary Anne!” Hitler says. The cartoon of the Führer and the little girl in his bed is eerily reminiscent of a story I once heard about a certain leader who took himself a child wife, but I have forgotten who it was. The second cartoon, posted yesterday, shows Jews amidst Auschwitz corpses. “We have to get to the 6,000,000 somehow!” one Jew tells another. “I don’t think they are Jews,” the other one replies. The third cartoon, posted today, shows Steven Spielberg ringing Peter Jackson to ask for his assistance with a Holocaust movie. “I don’t think I have that much imagination Steven, sorry,” Jackson replies.

The web site is down but you can see the first two here Edit: I found the third one with some difficulty so I added it to the site. I am only adding it to show the image not for any reason I disproved of the media republishing the Danish cartoons.

Run for cover, its a debate on abortion!

I've been quiet reluctant to throw my tuppence worth into the ring on the abortion debate thats spread like a rash across the Irish blogsphere. Unlike my Saintly colleague I do have strong views on the topic, but much of what I feel has been stated more eloquantly elsewhere. However as this blog has been referred to as an "umpire", I thought it would be remiss not to post an opposing view to The Saint. Simply put, I don't believe abortion should be legalised in Ireland. There are many layers to the debate and they have been addressed elsewhere, so I won't repeat them here. The fundamental issue, in my humble opinion, in this debate is when does human life begin? All other arguments are trumped by this as it involves our most basic right as a human, the right to life. This may be moralistic, but our law is based primarily on what is morally right and wrong. Granting somebody the 'status' of human being based on its ability to survive on its own is flawed and highly unsatisfactory. The new born baby will not survive on its own. Nor will somebody who is severely mentally handicapped. Yet nobody would deny that such persons are human beings. How about the level of dependence on the mother involved? Does somebody on a life support machine cease to be a human being for the duration they are on the life support machine? I believe that the simplest and most satisfying answer to that question is the life begins at the moment of fertilisation, conception. Thus the foetus growing in its mothers womb is an innocent human being. I, like many others, believe this to be the fundamental and pivitol issue in the debate. Once a human being exists, that human has a fundamental right to life, and that right is only matched by the right to life of other human beings. It is superior to all other rights and non-negotiable. Aud puts the point succinctly when she says "Refusal to extend the most basic of all human rights, the right to life, to unborn human beings, makes the ubiquitous human rights language that we reference so many of our dilemmas to, negotiable and wholly dependent on social/cultural mores. " I've read other blogs talking about rights of the mother, be they the right to choose, 'reproductive' rights, 'right to privacy and bodily integrity' etc. Whilst there is little doubt that these rights exist , surely they are not absolute and the right to life is superior to all such rights? I would echo the sentiments of Michael over at disillusioned lefty, where points out that, if the woman has freely entered into actions that can result in pregnancy then she should accept the responsibilities that arise when pregnancy occurs. In the instance of rape the woman of course has not freely entered into the actions which resulted in pregnancy. As a male I can't begin to put myself in the shoes of a woman in that position. However, that foetus is still a 100% innocent human being, with the same fundamental rights as every other human. Finally, The Irish State has a duty to protect the right to life of all the natural persons living on this Island, whether they be a citizen or not. This duty exists regardless of how dependent one person is on another, or the circumstances of that persons conception. Similarly every human being has the duty to respect the right to life of all other human beings. Legalising the murder of human beings, whether they be in the womb or not, is wholly inconsistent with these duties.

Abortion

The abortion debate is griping the Irish Blogsphere. So I guess I better put my views on virtual paper. Now I have often been called a fence sitter and I guess in many ways I am. But on this issue I take much the same attitude as I do on drugs. Drugs are bad but should be legalised. Same with abortion. I think abortion is basically wrong but should be legalised. Now I know this argument will result in both sides destroying my argument as it is based on zero principles. But I believe I’m right so poo to you . Whatever law that is brought into Ireland (or not in this case) abortion is still going to be available in the UK. This is going to result in women still going to the UK to have abortions. So we can bury our head in the sand on this issue or face facts. But the real victims (the foetus are inevitable victims) in this are the women coming back in the veil of secrecy. In serious need of supports. If abortion services were supplied in the state a better after care services could be provided and women would not be suffering in silence on this issue. Also in the state women could be allowed to see all the options or maybe after counselling more would chose adoption or to keep the child.

Who are we.

Fiona has started a new politcal meme. Richard Waghorne taged me Firstly I don't believe in labeling anyone as I believe people views should be read not what party they follow. So I am not going to answer all these questions. But anyway here is some.

Gender: Male

Age: 19-30

Nationality: Irish

Country of Residence: Ireland

Sexual Orientation: Straight

Do you have a disability? Yes Dislexia. I learned to tie my shoe laces and tell time at the age of about 13.(Even though I still have to tie my shoelaces over ten times a day as I can't tie them that well) still can't spell addreass though

How would you describe your political philosophy? I take each issue on a case by case basis

Level of Education: Graduate

If you were to vote on party lines which party would you choose (Ireland)? Not answering that one

If you were to vote on party lines which party would you choose (UK)? Or this one

If you were to vote on party lines which party would you choose (US)? I'd spoil my vote

Where do you stand on the EU? It is growing too fast should wait until the east European countries have built up their economies before moving east. Without this I think we are doing Turkey Bulgaria etc a disservice

Did you support the invasion of Afghanistan? darn tuten

Did you support the invasion of Iraq? Indeed

Do you continue to support either or both of those conflicts? Yes. But Rumsfeld couldn't plan a piss up in a brewery.

What do you believe is the single biggest issue facing Irish politics? Education

What do you believe is the single biggest issue facing European politics? American influence Good or bad?

What do you believe is the single biggest issue facing international politics? The Future of the UN

Are you, have you ever been, and do you ever wish to be involved in politics in a party political manner? No I have principles :)

Who would you have voted for in the past US Presidential Election? I would spoiled my vote I tag: The other 2 here Frank red rover

Edit: by Tuathal Gender: Male Age: 19-30 Nationality: Irish Country of Residence: The Emerald Isle Sexual Orientation: Hetro Do you have a disability? No. How would you describe your political philosophy? Right Wing & Liberal (in the true sense of the word) Level of Education: Graduate If you were to vote on party lines which party would you choose (Ireland)? Probably P.D
If you were to vote on party lines which party would you choose (UK)? "New" Labour
If you were to vote on party lines which party would you choose (US)? Republican
Where do you stand on the EU? I have a sneaking suspicion that the real purpopse of the EU is to provide the French with a means of finally conquering the world. Honestly though, the original idea of a common market is one which I wholeheartedly support. Anything beyond that I am unconfortable with. The EU appears to be in an awful hurry to expand i.e Turkey, which in my opinion is dangerous. Its about a week since ten new Countries joined the party. After the last week, is it really all that wise to already be talking about a country with 70,000,000 approx Muslims joining too?

Did you support the invasion of Afghanistan? Yes. Did you support the invasion of Iraq? Yes Do you continue to support either or both of those conflicts? Yes to Afghanistan. Yes and No to Iraq. I said at the time that if there was no WMDs found then going into Iraq would not be justified, and I stand by that. There are bigger threats than Saddam. Nonetheless, I believe Iraq and the Middle East will ultimately be a better place when all this is said and done. Now that the U.S are in there, I don't subscribe to the notion that they should cut their losses and get out at the soonest opportunity, regardless of the mess they leave in their wake. What do you believe is the single biggest issue facing Irish politics? Sinn Fein in the long term. Otherwise health. What do you believe is the single biggest issue facing European politics? Culture clash with Islam What do you believe is the single biggest issue facing international politics? The Middle East Are you, have you ever been, and do you ever wish to be involved in politics in a party political manner? No, I'd be no good at it and I'd be unelectable. Who would you have voted for in the past US Presidential Election? Bush, simply because the alternative was scary (Well scarier).

Abortion Debate Poll

I am putting my current poll on hold for a while to deal with the more important question of Abortion. Some blogs are weighing on the issue at the moment. So I think a poll question to see where attitudes lie is important. So you shall she the poll on the right. Please vote. Edit:some people can not see it for some reason. So can get poll here as well. Edit: The debate is building up. by the if you click the here you can see the pole

Edit: BTW Extreme case would be life and death decided by doctors so would still not be pro-choice.

Edit: Just realised the problem with the poll had to do with Internet Explorer.I am using Firefox and the poll worked fine. But I just checked it in IE and there was the problem. Sorry about that all. Or maybe it is Bill Gates that should be sorry. Anyway I think that is fixed now. So go vote on the right. If you still can't see it tell me and also the browser you are using. Sorry about this again.

For Fiona de Londras weighs in with Abortion Should be legal
Where's me country
Tom Cosgrave
Fiona a little more on Abortion
Me the saint
Damien Mulley
El Matador All-Ireland Abortion Policy Needed

Sarah Carey Life and death decision our leaders can’t face

Against Auds weighs in on the other side with The Next Big Thing -– Abortion Debate
Balrog Abortionists demand legalisation of murder
Michael Larkin disillusioned lefty
Tuathal run for cover its debate on abortion
Auds just another little bit more about
In Fact ah In opposition to abortion on demand
Auds. Abortion - Kid Rock, Reasons for, Men and Adoption
Rinceoir

Plain of Pillars sarah-carey and abortion
Plain of Pillars Abortion

1916 Commemoration and Neo-Redmondness

Of late Neo-Redmondism is on the rise. What is Neo-Redmondism you ask. Well it is a word I just made up. It basically is a belief that the 1916 rising was wrong and that John Redmond’s parlimentary party could have delivered a Irish Republic.

Ok firstly a bit of background for any foreign readers. John Redmond was leader of the Irish Parliamentary party from 1900 to 1918. The aim of the party was to get a home rule party in Dublin. This was granted in 1912 but was suspended due to a delay brought by the House of Lords. This meant that it would have granted in 1914. But when world war 1 broke out it was suspended until the end of the war. In 1916 the 1916 rising broke out.

So now the argument centres around the fact that John Redmouds method could have lead to an independent Ireland. John Burns in the Sunday Times argues this. Now hindsight is great and indeed Redmouds method would have worked. But it would have worked in the 1960s when Britain was going through its period of decolonisation but could anyone have known that No. So then we need to look at the fact at whether or not it could have produced a republic in or before 1949.

Firstly it was not the same as the free state as gained in 1922. It was a devolved assembly with limited powers. This would have meant that Dev would not have had the same powers to change the constitution as he did in 1937. We did not have the same power. In fact we would still have been part of the United Kingdom. This would have resulted us being involved in the second world war and all the trouble that would have brought. So just coming out of the Second World War the UK had no longer a conservative government and had a labour government might have given more freedom to Ireland but unlikely a Republic.

Now the other contention would be that a united Ireland could be achieved. But this would not have happened. The UVF was formed not to stop a Irish republic but to stop a home rule parliament in Dublin. The Ulster Unionist no more wanted a Home Rule parliament then a republic. So the Island would still have been divided.

So now we come to the argument about the rising had no support. Richard Waghourne Said

With hundreds of thousands of Irishmen at the front, next to no popular support, no mandate sought or received, no respect for human life, no prospect of success, and no attempt at agitating through the usual channels, the events of 1916, in my mind, have no possible defence. The attack was wholly illegitimate and it was the right and duty of the lawful authorities to put it down. Indeed, those who did so, in the first days, were themselves Irish, and the deep unpopularity of the rising at the time is well known.

Now another war that could be described in those terms is the war in Iraq which Richard supports. The United States did not go through the “usual channels” or “seek a mandate”( Edit :I'll admit they had a mandate from the congress but not from the UN. Thanks for Kevin of DL for pointing that out.) the war has “no popular support” Yet he is against the rising. In 1916 true the rising had no support yet the point that Richard and Kevin Myres forget to mention is that in 1918 Sinn Fein’s overwhelmly won the election pacifically on the basis’s and aims of the rising and this gives the Rising the mandate. Home rule was supported because there was no alternative the rising gave them an alternative. In 1918 the country was united by 1916 not home rule.

Edit:

On the issue of parliamentary support the last election in Ireland prior to 1918 was 1910 3 years before the formation of the Irish volunteers. This suggest that a ground swell of militaristic tradition had developed in the 3 years from 1910 to 1913 and had an election been held in 1914. Sinn Fein may have won some if not many seats.

People go on about the violence about how it was wrong. These are the same people who justify when it is for Iraqi freedom. Why treat Ireland different? People say Ireland could have negotiated freedom but that is highly unlikely. People say that the blood sacrifice was wrong but as Winston Churchill Said

"You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

Richard says 1916 has no place in our national self-understanding. But it is the very basis of our understanding like 1798, 1916 was when we said we are Irish and will not be ruled by others. It is our most united past event. Every party (save greens) had a part of it. 1918 can not claim that neither can 1922. In 1918 Labour did not run in the election. 1922 Sinn Fein split on pro and anti-treaty sides. The 1937 constitution was Fianna Fail, the declaration of the republic was Fine Gael. But 1916 is the in fact unifying factor of our national self-understanding the formations of Fianna Fail, PDs and Fine Gael came from Sinn Fein. Labour was invested in the Citizen Army.

We should all celebrate the 1916 and not allow the PIRA violence intimidate us into thinking that the 1916 rising was wrong. Maybe it is time for neo-republicanism.

1916 is Ireland.

United Irelander has some interesting quotes on the subject.

Irish Blog Awards Election Campaign

Considering that many blogs are asking for votes for the awards. I feel it is time for the Dossing Times election campaign posters. Edit more posters:

What can Iraq learn from Spain and Catalonia

Ask any random person in Barcelona what football club they support and they will say Barcelona. Rarely do you hear anyone say they support the other Barcelona primra League side Espanyol. The reason for this is the Barcelona Football club’s crest includes the Catalonia flag and the word Espanyol means Spanish and the crest has a crown. Barcelona football club has always been the symbol of Catalan nationalism. When Franco was in charge of Spain he tried to kill of Catalan identity. The language was banned in public and even calling a kid Jordi was banned as St Jordi was the patron saint of Catalonia. But all this has changed Catalonia nationalism is free and on the rise. Last September the Catalonia parliament passed a bill to declare Catalonia a nation but still part of the spainish state. This was forwarded to the Parliament in Madrid. Luis Rodriguez Zapatero the Spainish Prime ministers government is propped up by regional parties. This gives the Catalans a lot of power in parliament and they are not afraid to use it. The bill that was sent to parliament is likely to pass with some modifications. Although the above measures are supported in the polls. All is not well. From Backseat drivers

Lieutenant General José Mena Aguado, said that the armed forces may have to intervene should the new statute exceed the limits set by the constitution. Mena claimed that the military was empowered under the constitution to do so: "...if those limits were exceeded, which at the moment luckily seems unthinkable, Article 8 of the Constitution — the armed forces, including the army, the navy and the air force, have the mission to guarantee the sovereignty and independence of Spain and to defend her territorial integrity and the Constitutional order".

The Lieutenant General was immediately put under house arrest as a military leader is prohibited from making a public statements on political opinions. While a military coup is unlikely in an EU country and the constitution doesn't support this it does seems to show an underlining extreme dislike in Spain for the idea of a separate Catalan nation. Nationalism and greed are possibly the 2 most driving forces in the world. These are also the 2 forces involved in the Catalan Spain divide. Spanish people feel like the Lieutenant General feel Spain can not be split. They also want to keep the tax monies rolling in from Barcelona. Catalans see themselves as Catalans as different to the rest of Spain. They also want to see their tax stay within their region. So what can this teach Iraq. Spain is a prosperous and peaceful country relative to Iraq. Yet tensions between different factions dominate politics. Europe has never been more divided yet also it has never been more peaceful. Why? When you do not give a people their own say, their own land, their own independence they will do all in their power to obtain it. When they do have all these things they will do all in their power to enhance it. Catalan nationalism is predominantly non violent because the people are predominantly prosperous. This limits them to peaceful needs. The more you have to lose the less you are willing to do. In Iraq the country is clearly divided into Kurdish Sunni and Shiite areas. These are basically different "tribes". Where as the French, German, Belgium, "tribes" have their own lands and independence the Iraqi "tribes" do not. The oil is in the North and the South not the middle. But greed is not strong enough to keep a country together nationalism is going to break it apart until each "tribe" has its independence. Until they are separate like the EU countries will their greed make them realise that they will work best together. Whether or not each tribes desire for independence can be fulfilled in a federal Iraq is another question. But I think until America realises like Spain that somethings are just not going to stick together forever Iraq will not be peaceful.

Dossing Times poll question.

I saw this statement over on Irish Health

“2 in 5 doctors believe obese patients, smokers and heavy drinkers should be excluded from some treatments”

Primary Care study Suffolk, UK

If you are sick of something that is your own fault such as lung cancer from smoking or liver damage from drinking. Something that you know that is bad for you. Should the state pay for your treatment.

So the poll questioon is If you are sick because of your own actions does the state have a duty of care.

Vote now on the right.

Results of Dossing Times NATO Poll

On the question should Ireland join NATO. No 52.7% 29 Votes Yes 47.3% 26 Votes This result has surprised me. I did not think NATO support would be so strong. Anyway there will be more on this issue later.

Irish Blog Awards Voting open

Voting is open for the Irish Blog awards. So go here and pick who you think is the best blogger in all the categories. The top 5 in each lot will be shortlisted for the judges to pick the eventually winners I think. Edit: I didn't want to tut our own horn but everyone else is tuting theirs :). So you can vote for the Dossing Times in the catagories of Best Political Blog and Best Blog post for this. On behalf of Myself Tuathal and Ck thanks to all for reading our stuff.

A new war in East Africa?

In 2 countries Ethiopia and Eritrea where the people are in desperate need of help. Their leaders are gearing up for a fight.

Brokeback Fighter Squadron

Brokeback Fighter Squadron :-) Hat tip (here)

Because we "Can"

Spain's leading newspaper became the latest European paper to publish a cartoon depicting the prophet Mohammad today, publishing a cartoon previously published in France on it's front page. The cartoon in question portrayed Mohammad's head made up of lines which say "I must not draw Mohammad" in French. Is it me, or is that taking the piss, just a little? Freedom of speech and expression are fundamental to our society, but human decency is vital too. Printing cartoons that will obviously cause massive offense, just to show we "can" print them, is not what freedom of speech is about. In fact if doing so is supposed to show how 'great' our free & democratic society is, then it is a shockingly poor advert for it. Both sides have taken an extreme stance on the issue, demanding the other to accept their values absolutely. No attempt has been made to see the others point of view. Are Western and Muslim cultures so different that dialogue cannot find a compromise? And should the more "culturally advanced" West continue to pour salt into the wounds by republishing the cartoons over and over, until Muslims get the point?

Is religion more identity then faith

Many people believe that religion is a matter of faith. A new term is appearing in Irish life. A pseudo-religion Al carte Catholicism. Many people think that the Catholic Church should change their views to suit a “modern Ireland” yet why should they Catholic faith is the Catholic faith. Catholic Dogma is Catholic Dogma. Religion is a set of values set by a higher power and not you. The Catholic Church’s values do not include divorce, married priests, female priests, accepting of gay relationships etc. If you do not agree with the set of values of the Catholic Church you are not a follower of the Catholic Church. Religious values do not change with the times they are supposed to transcend time.

In the Catholic Church at the age of about 12 kids get confirmed. Do you know any 12 year olds that can confirm their favourite bar of chocolate let alone there beliefs. For that matter can you think of any 20 year old that could confirm their beliefs. So why do kids go through this process. They do so because it is part of the school day. The school go through the hymns prayers and choreography of day but never address the most important aspect of the day the conformation of belief. Kids are never made question and analysis their beliefs. Why? Because they are 12 year olds and don’t have the ability too. But the meaning of conformation is that you have fully questioned your beliefs and are saying that your belief is in the Catholic Church is without questioned.

In Ireland the beliefs of the majority of young Catholics include divorce, etc are not the beliefs of the Catholic Church but of the Anglican Church. Yet people are not heading on down to the local Church of Ireland of a Sunday the theological differences are minuscule. So why do people not follow a faith that is not their faith?

Despite the fact that the likes of Wolfe Tone and Bono are protestant nationalism and Irishness is always aligned to the catholic church. When people talk about the North the terms catholic and nationalist are intertwined. Throughout Irish history protestants were seen as the oppressors of the Irish Catholics. Some people have thrown scorn on the Ulster Unionist proposals to try to attract catholic voters. Yet 25% of catholic voters are reportedly pro union.

In America what kept the Irish community together was the church while the Ulster-Scots Presbyterians never have had that same sense of community. In the census most people say that they are Catholic. Even though they no longer adhere to the tenements of the Catholic faith they still say that they are Catholic.

So why do people say they are catholic when their beliefs are closer to Church of Ireland. Is it because Catholism is still the identity of many Irish. During the penal times many people changed their religion from Catholic to Anglican to keep their land. This was seen as been a sell-out. So is it still in modern Ireland not acceptable to be a protestant. While we accept people coming to this country being protestant do we still have a hang up of Irish people being protestant?

I already discussed the case of Islam extremism in Britain being an identity in Britain. But what does the latest riots over the Danish cartoons say about Islam. The Koran says

5:32: "For that cause We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind. Our messengers came unto them of old with clear proofs (of Allah's sovereignty), but afterwards lo! Many of them become prodigals of the earth."

Now are these cartoons deemed to be “corruption in the earth” and is this the reason of the attacks or are the cartoons seen as an attack on their identity? Or like in Ireland is religion and identity intertwined beyond faith?

While Christian Irish take no offence at Cartoons of jesus. Would we take no offence at this cartoon from the 19th century punch magazine.

Top 6 Friday Dossing Times suggestions for adaptations of TV series that will never be made.

6. E.R Dublin. I need a trolley stat 5.Celebrity love island. George Gallowey is looking for love. 4. Lost season 3. Four women and a map. 3.I’m a politician get me out of here. George Galloway in his constituency. 2.Hanging with Hector. Hector introduces us to the world of hanging as he hangs some of the worlds greatest fiends. (Tá a muineál bhriste) 1. Survivor with Suicide bombers and George Galloway

Tree Hugging Rock-Stars

The growing craze amongst the conscience driven pop star is to 'carbon neutralise' their music by buying enough trees to absorb the carbon produced by their albums and tours. Chris Martin has just bought 50,000 trees to make ammends for Coldplay's latest album and the upcoming tour. Now correct me if I'm wrong here, but wouldn't you need to purchase land and plant the required number of new trees in order to truely carbon neutralise their music. What's the point of buying trees that are already in existence and will absorb the carbon anyway? Coldplay aren't the only people to jump at the opportunity to do something for the environment however, with the Rolling Stones, David Gray, KT Tungstel and the Sex Pistols all owning forests around the world. It all appears to be a big scam to fool gullible rock stars however. As the director of Climate Care put it "When Mick Jagger's trees die in 50 years' time, they will release the CO2 they have been storing at a time when the situation is likely to be more critical." You can't blame Chris though. Man, if I had made millions from releasing pretty much the same album over and over again, I'd be feeling a little guilty too.

Miracle in Limerick the Blind and lame can walk

Manuel Estimulo discovers that a miracle has happened on the streets of Limerick. A blind and disabled man was miraculous cured and then managed to get a cup of coffee. With this sort of photographic evidence maybe the pope will consider creating a St Limerick pavement

Danish Cartoons and Freedom of Speech

As I was travelling in to college this morning, an unprovoked Ray D'Arcy, decided to commit a crime against humanity and played the latest 'song' from Girls Aloud. Immediatedly, my primitive survival instincts kicked in and I changed station, to 2fm. What I stumbled across was a debate, for lack of a better word, on the G-Ryan show about the recent Danish cartoon controversy.

Briefly, the cartoons were published in last September in a Danish newspaper, depicting the prophet Muhammad wearing a bomb on his head and elsewhere saying that paradise was running short of virgins for suicide bombers. This sparked outrage in the Muslim world, with Saudi Arabia and Syria recalling their ambassadors to Denmark and drawing threats from Islamic militants. Since then, the cartoons have been published in 7 newspapers across Europe, in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain. The editor of France Soir, Jaques Lefranc, was sacked yesterday for publishing the cartoons, as 'a powerful sign of respect for the intimiate beliefs and convictions of every individual'.Gerry and his callers were considering the effect these caricatures would have, and the topic evolved quickly onto the true extent of freedom of speech/expression.

He began with a Muslim caller, who was understanably upset at the publications and believed that it was right for the French editor to lose his job over the matter. He stated that the editor would have known the hurt this would cause in Muslim circles and as such had a duty not to publish them. European Muslims reacted similarly with the vice-chairman of the central council of Muslims in Germany, Mohammad Aman Hobohm saying 'It was done not to defend freedom of the press, but to spite the Muslims'.

Gerry took this as his cue and launch into proclaiming that by the days end the cartoons would be in every nook and cranny of Afghanistan and that there would be 'Jihad' over them. He said that he could easily envisage a scene where an Islamic suicide bomber would blow himself and a newspaper office to bits over the cartoons. Noting the riots in Paris last October, he predicted that similar riots could occur in this instance and with this in mind asked the question of whether the freedom of the press and the freedom of speech/expression should be tempered when it comes to satirising religious leaders and icons.

Next came the proponents of free speech to champion the cause. One caller proclaimed that the French editor was fired for 'doing his job' and that the problem was that 'these people [Muslims], just don't have any sense of humour and don't understand how comedy works'. Gerry in accepting this point 'completely' stated that Muslims are on the whole far more serious about their religion that Christians.

A subsequent caller argued that freedom of speech is almost absolute in Western Society, stating that if someone takes offense to something somebody says or prints, that's there problem. He also asked whether the principles of liberal Western Society should be tempered just so we don't offend the 'medievil' culture of the Middle East, one which isn't 'compatible' with ours anyway?

The caricatures in question did not break any laws in any state they were published in. So, should freedom of speech be restricted where such speech will offend a religious movement? Or how about if such speech will cause widespread offence in general? Or should freedom of speech be held hostage by a fear of a violent reaction from the Arab world, or other factions within our society?

I'm at a loss to find a satisfactory middle ground on the issue. Freedom of speech, like every other right, is not absolute in Western society, despite what Gerry's callers might believe. Even the right to life is conditional in some Western democracies (cough, the 'land of the free'). If we take it as true that the caricatures in question create the risk of violent recriminations from Islamic militants, then it seems logical that people should be wary of offending such people. However that is hardly satisfactory as Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus etc. are unlikely to react violently to being similarly offended and thus we create a special case for Muslims, where all other religions are fair game. Conversely we could go down the road of making all religions a special case, where none can be criticised in any way, for fear of causing offense. Again that is hardly a satisfactory solution.

My gut reaction to the issue however is that society should be as free as possible, and any restrictions on that freedom should come solely from the people, acting through their elected Government. As such, I am ill at ease with the idea that freedom of expression should be tempered purely because of what Islamic terrorists might find sufficently offensive to react violently to.

Irish Conspiracy for World Domination

The Jewish conspiracy is known the world over. The holocaust denier Mark Weber, who is director of the American Institute for Historical Review said a few years ago that "Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable influence in American economic, cultural, intellectual and political life ... close to half its billionaires are Jews.

They claim that the Jews control the media and to make sure that is manifested in the Americas policy towards Israel where Israel seem to get a freer hand in dealing with rivals then any other countries. But is all this is just to hide the true conspiracy in the world the Irish Conspiracy.?

Now many foreign readers of this are saying ah but the Irish are great they are great craic everyone loves the Irish. But this may all be a myth to hide the fact that the Irish are closing in on world domination created by the Irish controlled media and grip on the most powerfull office in the world.

One of the most powerful media figures on the right is Bill O’Reilly an Irish American one of the most powerful on the left is Michael Moore an Irish American. But it doesn’t stop in front of the camera.

One of the most powerful media moguls is Rupert Murdock. He controls Fox news one of the most powerful news agency in America The Times in London Britain’s newspaper of record, the Sun the largest selling paper. Sky News one of Britain’s top news channels. He also has numerous Australian titles. So is he Jewish? No but his mother is of Irish decent. Tony O’Reilly owns the Independent in Britain. The owner and CEO of the Tribune company which owns many of the big American papers is Dennis Fitzsimmons which is an Irish name this suggests that he is Irish, the president of the broadcast division is Patrick Mullen. If you look across other papers you will also see many Irish names appearing as Editors.

But possibly the most damming statistic is this.

George W Bush’s great great grandmother was Mary Elizabeth Butler so he and his father have Irish Ancestry

Bill Clinton had Irish Ancestry

Ronald Regan had Irish Ancestry

Jimmy Carter Wife’s mother was of Irish Decent

Gerald Ford was born Leslie Lynch King, Jr so is in fact of Irish Ancestry

Richard Nixon was of Irish decent

John F Kennedy was of Irish decent

So in the last 46 years only Lyndon Johnson has no Irish connection that I can find.(and we all saw JFK didn't we maybe he is part of another organisation trying to stop the Irish) The Irish are infiltrating the world order. Look at leaders of other countries where the Irish have gone you will see that they have infiltrated the higher echelons of power.

Now much of the facts may be indeed a bit murky all such world domination plans are conducted in secret behind closed doors. However the evidence is a lot stronger then Jewish Conspiracy theory. But if you still don’t believe that Irish wheald more power then any other people. I will leave you with this question What national holiday is celebrated in more countries and to such a large extent that rivers are coloured then the Irish St Patrick’s Day?

Edit 07/02/06 the new President of the International Court of Justice is Rosalyn Higgins . Will anyone believe me until it is to late.

Update: Tony Blair's mother is from Donegal. So he is also Irish.

Munster Match

Sorry for taking so long to put these pictures of the Munster Sale Rugby match up on the Blog. Fr Click to see larger versions. TRY!!

Key Quotes of the IMC report

Key quotes

We believe that there is no intention on the part of a number of those groups, in particular PIRA,to revert to terrorism but there still remain questions about how far this dynamic will develop. There seems to be a growing awareness within groups on both sides that violence and crime – even if they had been considered an acceptable option in the past – do not now offer a way forward which is either right or likely to bear political fruit in the longer term.

On this occasion, for the first time, we report 2 further dissident groupings. One – styling itself as Óglaigh na hÉireann (ONH) – has splintered from CIRA and the other – describing itself as Saoirse na hÉireann (SNH)

We conclude that CIRA remains a threat; that it will continue to mount real and hoax attacks; and that it will continue to plan violence and to seek to enhance its capacity.

We are of the firm view that the present PIRA leadership has taken the strategic decision to end the armed campaign and pursue the political course which it has publicly articulated.

There has been some press comment about possible changes in the membership of the Provisional Army Council but these remain unconfirmed.

We referred in our last report to intelligence gathering. We believe that the organisation continues to engage in it, and has no present intention of doing otherwise.This is an activity which we believe is authorised by the leadership and which involves some very senior members. While some of it may be for defensive purposes, it is predominantly directed towards supporting the political strategy. It involves among other things the continuation of efforts to penetrate public and other institutions with the intention of illegally obtaining or handling sensitive information. This raises the question of whether the commitment to exclusively democratic means is full and thorough going, or whether there remain elements of a continuing subversive intent going beyond the boundaries of democratic politics,

There are indications that in some areas PIRA units have been closing down criminal operations and clearing stocks of contraband goods, and we have no reports of PIRA sanctioned robberies in the period under review. However, members and former members of PIRA continue to be heavily involved in serious organised crime, including counterfeiting and the smuggling of fuel and tobacco11. As in the past, we are not able to say confidently to what extent the substantial proceeds of crime are passed to the organisation.

PIRA continues to raise funds and we also believe that it looks to the long term exploitation of the proceeds of earlier crimes, for example through the purchase of property or legitimate businesses.

To sum up, the position is not entirely straightforward. We see a number of definite signs of the organisation moving in the direction indicated in the 28 July statement. We see other signs which we would describe as neutral and some which are more disturbing. For example, some members continue to be engaged in significant crime and occasional unauthorised assaults. Whereas these assaults are not in our view sanctioned by the leadership, and may be directly against its wishes, the contrary appears to be the case with some other criminal activities such as the exploitation of financial assets PIRA had previously acquired or the illegal gathering of intelligence. The indications that PIRA appears to retain long term intentions to gather intelligence is also in our view a matter for concern. On the other hand we believe there is a clear strategic intent to turn the organisation on to a political path and there is good evidence that this is happening even given such constraints as there may be on the leadership in this regard.

In the 3 months under review in this report RIRA – within which there are two factions – has continued to seek to enhance its capacity as a paramilitary organisation. It has sought to develop its capacity to acquire intelligence, particularly on the security forces. It continues to develop its equipment and to seek both to recruit members and to acquire munitions. Some parts of the organisation are working on a long-term strategy and are focussing on the training of members.

Loyalist groups, which are violent as well as responsible for a wide range of other crime, have not made the strategic choice which PIRA has made. But there are some early signs of change amongst loyalists which we hope to see taken much further.

IMC report

The IMC report is online here. More on it when i get to read it.Hat tip Slugger

Immigrants,childcare and elections

The big two stories so far this year have been work permits and the new story that the governments new childcare proposal means that workers here can get the €1000 euro benefit when their kids are back home in Eastern Europe. This amounts to according to Fine Gael €150million and Fine Gael MEP Mairead McGuinness to €50million more then the budget budgeted for. The government say that they have budgeted for it by taken into account the child benefit scheme already in place. However this is basically crap nobody in this country knows what they can claim so the likelihood of immigrants knowing what they can get is not likely. But they will now know with all the media coverage.

I am with Fine Gael on this one. Now I think immigrant workers should be and are entitled to the normal child care benefit. That is for the upkeep of children of people in the state and the fact that they are in Eastern Europe is inconsequential. The childcare grant is to help parents with childcare. It is suppose to make it feasible for both parents to stay in the workforce. But as the kids are in Eastern Europe they are not impeding their parent(s) from working and thus the childcare provision does not achieve its aim and thus is wasted tax payers money. The reason the government did not operate a voucher system for childcare places was to pander to the one group that has faced down the government and won. The stay at home mothers. They brought down McCreavys individualisation project and Fianna Fail didn’t want to suffer the same kind of defeat so close to an election. So the benefit was to all children instead of to subsides workers childcare. Hence we are where we are.

Elections are about issue. Always have been and always will be. In 1918 despite what Kevin Myres might think the issue was about the 1916 rising and independence, during the 80s it was the economy. So what is it going to be next election. The smart money is on health. The economy is basically spectacular but the health system is dire. So you would expect healthcare to be the only words coming out of Labour Greens and Fine Gael would be beds, MRSA, consultants, weighting list and trolleys. True the words have been coming out. However not as much as would be expected.

The words that are coming out though are about immigration. This suggest that this will be the platform on which the election is fought. If there is any major crime or murder carried out by a Immigrant that catchs the public imagination watch this powder keg go off.

I hope I am wrong